Search for: "Davis v. Municipal Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Recognizing Birmingham’s right to speak free from state interference was indicated by Supreme Court precedent, the judge observed, because the Court, as early as 1960 in Gomillion v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:43 pm
Municipal Court(1988) 46 Cal.3d 64, 75.) [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am
The Court invited the Michigan Association for Justice, Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., and Michigan Municipal League to file briefs amicus curiae. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
If, as some have worried, "[e]achtime the Court overrules a case, the Court . . . cause[s] thepublic to become increasingly uncertain about which casesthe Court will overrule," Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am
As the Court saw it: Defendants, relying on Farmer v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:14 am
Davis, 100 S.W.2d 94, 95 (Tex. 1937); City of Austin v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases like Ward v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 10:26 am
Eugene Davis joined in it. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:34 am
” At the Appellate Practice Blog of the International Municipal Lawyers Association, Lisa Soronen previews Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 4:56 pm
Davis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Such state laws are often called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, or RFRAs—named and patterned after the federal RRFA adopted by Congress after the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am
At the UC Davis Law Review Online, Chad Flanders assesses the cert petition in Hidalgo v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:45 pm
In Alito’s second decision, in Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
Davis, courts must intervene to strike down state laws that unduly burden interstate commerce because otherwise, we might end up waiting “for decades until Congress can act. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
In the many cases (at the lower courts and the Supreme Court) upholding parts or all of regulations and court injunctions limiting protestor activity near clinic entrances and procedure rooms, noise has been one of the factors courts have held can be meaningfully taken into account by regulators because the noise itself interferes with a clinic’s function, and that harm must be considered alongside the interests of the protestors.CleanlinessAnother… [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:21 am
Davis v Isaacson, Robustelli, Fox, Fine, Greco & Fogelgaren, 284 AD2d 104, 726 NYS2d 86 [1st Dept 2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 613, 742 NYS2d 606 [2002]. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Murr v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Young v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:52 am
Davis, 366 N.J. [read post]
