Search for: "Deborah Pearlstein"
Results 121 - 140
of 162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2008, 4:58 pm
Deborah Pearlstein thinks so and I would agree. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:06 pm
Gore (2000), is here), Pamela Harris (Georgetown), Deborah Pearlstein (Princeton (prior posts); her contribution to our symposium edition, on Guantánamo-related cases, is here), and Sonja West (Georgia).And if that's not enough reading, there are any number of Stevens opinions from which to choose. [read post]
13 May 2010, 9:38 am
Deborah Pearlstein (Princton University); Prof. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:14 am
” At Balkinization, Deborah Pearlstein considers the possible effect of Kavanaugh’s confirmation process on “public perceptions of the Court. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Fisher, Professor, Stanford Law School; former clerk for Justice John Paul Stevens Jamal Greene, Professor, Columbia Law School; former clerk for Justice John Paul Stevens Deborah Pearlstein, Professor, Princeton University; former clerk for Justice John Paul Stevens (Moderator) 10:50 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. [read post]
29 May 2016, 12:00 am
”In the Washington Post, Deborah Pearlstein assesses “Rogue Justice: The Making of the Security State," in which Karen Greenberg analyzes national security law post-9/11. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Deborah Pearlstein commented on Charlie Savage’s NY Times article about executive power, and after a thought-provoking comment by Savage himself, clarified her position. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:01 am
” Deborah Pearlstein of Balkinization explains that she has “a hard time seeing the decision as quite so necessarily damaging on its own to the future power of the feds,” while Steven Schwinn of Constitutional Law Prof Blog contends that the decision’s net effect on the Necessary and Proper Clause was “[v]ery little. [read post]
12 May 2012, 6:00 am
Deborah Pearlstein addressed the question whether things might have gone differently had a regular criminal court been the forum for this trial. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:00 am
” After yesterday’s New York Times story about Obama and targeted killings pointed out by our own Deborah Pearlstein, Foreign Policy mapped where the drones are. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Deborah Pearlstein considered the speech an anti-climax, because of the many questions it fails to answer. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 3:38 pm
Stevens clerks: Daniel Farber, OT ’76, Berkeley law professor Susan Estrich, OT ’78, University of Southern California law professor James Liebman, OT ’78, Columbia law professor Cliff Sloan, OT ’85, Skadden, Arps partner Teresa Wynn Roseborough, OT ’87, MetLife senior chief litigation counsel Diane Marie Amann, OT ’88, University of California at Davis law professor Christopher Eisgruber, OT ’89,… [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 4:00 pm
Morrison, former District of Columbia Special Counsel John Payton, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund Deborah Pearlstein, visiting scholar at Princeton University Andrew J. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
The coronavirus pandemic has raised a host of constitutional questions—including the interplay between state and federal governments in responding to the crisis; how government can function while adhering to social distancing; how emergency presidential powers may impact democratic norms; whether voting procedures need to be changed; and more. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
” Cardozo Law Professor Deborah Pearlstein’s essay made a powerful case for the permissibility of speech regulations that promote the institutions of democracy. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am
” Additional analysis and commentary comes from James Hohmann for The Washington Post; Jane Schacter and Pamela Karlan at Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, here and here; Deborah Pearlstein at TPM Café; and Richard Hasen at Slate, who maintains that Stevens’ controlling opinion for the court in Crawford v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:14 am
As Deborah Pearlstein points out , the administration has failed to provide a consistent, let alone valid, legal theory why one case goes to a military commission and another to federal court—why one prisoner gets full due process in a federal trial while another receives due process lite in a refurbished commission. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:49 pm
" One need look no further than WaPo business writer Steven Pearlstein who championed the bailout and upbraided a reader critical of his columns by pointing to his own Pulitzer prize. [read post]
19 May 2012, 6:00 am
Deborah Pearlstein’s comments situated the issue of liability of private military contractors against the broader background of waning legal and political accountability in the use of American war power more generally. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:37 pm
Lyle Denniston already has a thorough summary here, and Deborah Pearlstein has some thoughts on, inter alia, the hard-to-follow (if not non-sensical) international law discussion here.I wanted to write separately, though, to flag Judge Brown's separate (and solo) concurrence. [read post]
