Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 6,447
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2009, 12:01 am
Expert certainty was not required for handwriting expert, as the expert opined that only a few documents were "definitely" authored by the defendant, some were "probably" authored by him and no "definitive conclusion" could be reached on the balance; any questions concerning the degree of certainty went to the weight of the evidence and not admissibility, in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm
Attorney General, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a ban on corporate expenditures to speak in support of or opposition to political candidates — pretty much the same sort of ban that the United States Supreme Court struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:05 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:52 am
United States, 529 U.S. 172, 191 (1997)]; United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:23 am
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:18 pm
” Jenkins v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:47 pm
See Matter of Robert BAUTISTA, 25 I&N Dec. 616 (BIA 2011).The BIA used the categorical approach set forth in Taylor v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:44 am
Guo, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, islawfully present in the United States on an F-1 studentvisa. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:51 am
A case called State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:05 pm
On Monday, November 30, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Renico v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 2:28 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently addressed the parameters of this right in State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
D.C. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 11:17 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964), the United States Supreme Court has found that the First Amendment limits the circumstances under which a speaker or publisher may be punished for making false and defamatory statements: "Neither lies nor false communications serve the ends of the First Amendment . . . [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:11 pm
I have now had a chance to review the transcript in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
” It cited with approval United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:39 am
By a rare 9-0 vote, in United States v. [read post]
