Search for: "Desist v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2018, 2:59 pm by Frederick Robinson (US)
U.S. ex rel Escobar, the United States Supreme Court emphasized the importance of the materiality standard in False Claims Act cases. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:22 am by Lisa Baird
According to the ruling, the ITC does not have jurisdiction over digital data transmitted into the United States from abroad due to the fact that digital data is not a “material thing. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:19 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of FloridaOpinion Date: 11/10/09Cite: Ride-Away Handicap Equipment Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:25 pm
The speech prohibited in the cake case, like the “White Applicants Only” sign, is thus quite similar to solicitation of illegal conduct, or offers of illegal conduct, which the Court has held are constitutionally unprotected (see United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:31 am by Florian Mueller
On Friday it became discoverable that Apple has filed a motion with the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) for a stay of remedial orders (import ban, cease and desist) pending an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:43 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Swagway v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:11 am
Says the Huffington Post, ‘UFW attorneys have sent a Cease and Desist letter to Urban Outfitters and their public relations manager is in the process of removing the shirt from all their stores and website’. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:05 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  First, Amsted asserts that Tianrui “overlooks that some of the misappropriation actually took place in the United States and at the United States border. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Devin Ricci
Images from Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.On June 8, 2023, the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Jack Daniels in the case of Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
§ 105 that works of the United States government may not receive copyright protection, therefore also placing it in the public domain.However, as a copyright owned by a private individual, the Aboriginal flag is subject to the Australian standard duration of copyright protection - the period of Mr Thomas’s life plus 70 years - and will not otherwise enter the public domain until this period is over.Solutions? [read post]