Search for: "Do v. Department of Housing and Urban Development" Results 121 - 140 of 238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am by Paul Hancock and Andrew C. Glass
On June 25, 2015, the Supreme Court, by a five-to-four margin, upheld the application of disparate impact under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:23 pm by Katie Porter
On Friday, Quicken sued the Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, asking the court for a declaratory judgment and injunction that would halt the government's efforts to bring Quicken to settle its alleged FHA liability. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 9:37 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 6301 et seq., requires the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development to use procurement contracts rather than cooperative agreements as the legal instruments for conveying federal funds to state and local public housing agencies in connection with programs under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm by Michael Froomkin
Danger of “affluent flight” if crime goes up due to urbanization. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am by Amy Howe
As I noted in my preview of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:10 am by Roger Clegg
“We were afraid we might lose disparate impact in the Supreme Court because there wasn’t a regulation,” said Sara Pratt, an official in the Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:08 am by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) regulation to the same effect – without running afoul of constitutional concerns. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am by Benjamin Bissell
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 6:53 am by Supreme People's Court Observer
Case nine, Zhang Liang v. the Shanghai Urban Planning and Land and Natural Resources Bureaus, in which the plaintiff sought access to payment concerning 116 parcels of land granted by the government. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:17 am by Francis Davey
Both were professors at the University of Cambridge but in different departments so that the argument might be characterised as Economics v Land Economy. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by WIMS
Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funds <> Things To Know About Rep. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
 While politics is important, America is a legalistic country, and the collective views of the legal profession will also have a large impact on the future vitality of the twentieth century legacy -- and this is a good place to further develop the implications of  Jamal Greene's insightful analysis. [read post]