Search for: "Doctor v. Employment Division"
Results 121 - 140
of 359
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
The DOLs Wage and Hour Division issued six new opinion letters August 28, which include: 1. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Public Works, 257 A.D.2d 972, the Appellate Division upheld the employer imposing a greater penalty that the one recommended by the hearing officer as there was ample evidence in the record to support the employer’s decision.In short, courts are reluctant to substitute their judgment for that of the employer on the fairness of penalties, but will do so if the penalty appears grossly unfair -- the standard established in Pell v Board of Education, 34… [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:41 pm
He appealed to the appeals referee, and then to the Employment Security Division. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 12:10 pm
As a result, her doctors placed her on bed rest for the final 10 weeks of her pregnancy. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
” The attorney for the employer failed to call the doctor as a witness during the trial. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 9:21 am
The case, Mosby-Meachem v Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division, involved an in-house attorney for Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
The plaintiff, Andrea Mosby-Meachem, worked as an in-house labor and employment attorney for Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
The plaintiff, Andrea Mosby-Meachem, worked as an in-house labor and employment attorney for Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Public Works, 257 A.D.2d 972, the Appellate Division upheld the employer imposing a greater penalty that the one recommended by the hearing officer as there was ample evidence in the record to support the employer’s decision.In short, courts are reluctant to substitute their judgment for that of the employer on the fairness of penalties, but will do so if the penalty appears grossly unfair -- the standard established in Pell v Board of Education, 34… [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 1:16 pm
Additional Resources: O’Malley v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:48 am
The most comprehensive discussion of this ambiguous phrase comes from Arbitrator Chauvin in Access Alliance Multicultural Community v Health, Office, Professional Employees and Education Division of UFCW, Local 175. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:48 am
In Hicks v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:35 am
Both lower courts rejected the religion claim based on the Employment Division v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
The ALJ found that the record supported the employee's claim that her supervisor had approved her request for leave without pay and that that leave was supported by a valid doctor's note.In contrast, Judge Zorgniotti found that the employer did prove the charges with respect to the second week of the employee's absence. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
The ALJ found that the record supported the employee's claim that her supervisor had approved her request for leave without pay and that that leave was supported by a valid doctor's note.In contrast, Judge Zorgniotti found that the employer did prove the charges with respect to the second week of the employee's absence. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
The ALJ found that the record supported the employee's claim that her supervisor had approved her request for leave without pay and that that leave was supported by a valid doctor's note.In contrast, Judge Zorgniotti found that the employer did prove the charges with respect to the second week of the employee's absence. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
Several decisions of the Appellate Division delineate the appropriate limits of a commercial property owners liability for off-premises injuries. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
Not by the standards of his employers or colleagues, if different. [read post]
