Search for: "Doe v. Arizona Senate"
Results 121 - 140
of 415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Unanimously, that is, among the Senators who knew this was happening. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:05 pm
Does a single reader believe that President Warren would be able to get a scintilla of her program through Congress? [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 8:16 am
” It is difficult to make a discrimination claim stick when a state has such an open and extended process for voting as Arizona does. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, decided shortly before Bush v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
As Apple and Google are based in California, not Arizona, the argument is apparently made by the bill's opponents that this is interstate commerce and Arizona is just trying to favor its own companies, but again, the vote on constitutionality was unanimous and in favor of this proposal.Assuming for the sake of the argument that Arizona (though it could also be any other state) passed such a statute into law, what would happen? [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:33 am
But surely she is correct: in a post-West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm
Neither justice mentions In re Gault, the 1967 Arizona case the Supreme Court agreed to hear exactly one week after announcing Miranda v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:52 am
The new case, involving a child sexual abuse prosecution in Arizona, is Martinez v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:19 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in Casias v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm
He began by reminding the Court of its 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:11 am
Arizona. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm
Supreme Court Center.Alleyne v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:22 am
” Nor did the Arizona Supreme Court’s decision in Fields v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
In Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:17 am
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Erwin Chemerinsky argues that the Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
The first was Turner v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:07 pm
Nor is there any argument that the current Court might not follow Truax; Justice Kennedy cited it with approval three years ago in the substantively similar decision in Arizona v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am
” And at the Huffington Post, Brennan Center attorney Monica Youn responds to comments made on the Senate floor last week by Senator Mitch McConnell, who criticized Kagan’s support of the government’s position in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
Section 9026.5 does not restrict Plaintiffs’ own expressive activity. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:18 am
Perhaps the most significant grant of the day came in two cases that will be argued together: Arizona Republican Party v. [read post]
