Search for: "Doe v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 121 - 140
of 749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2023, 10:19 am
An examination revealed tenderness to palpation in the cervical and lumbar paraspinal muscles and left trapezius. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 1:42 am
However, the Deputy Judge found that it was unlikely that patients would be aware of any adverse court decision, given that the ostomy products are provided to patient's by medical professionals (para. 46). [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
Examining Attorney Barbara A. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 11:25 am
Texas Medical Association v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:22 pm
The pharmaceutical composition claim which is in standard form for a first medical indication would block research into further formulations and further medical indications for nitroglycerin. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:32 am
In this case, the workers’ comp insurance carrier sent the injured worker for an Independent Medical Examination (IME; more realistically referred to as a “Defense Medical Exam,” as there is usually nothing “independent” about it). [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 12:27 pm
Several medical reports and the deposition testimony of panel qualified medical examiner (PQME), Dr. [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] Can a state immunize its agencies from federal antitrust law through judicial review?
13 Sep 2016, 7:16 am
Texas Medical Board, a Fifth Circuit case involving the antitrust state-action immunity doctrine. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:15 am
LLC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:49 am
A recent case, Krinsky v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 8:36 am
Note, though, that General Counsel Peter Robb has signaled his intent to revisit the Obama Board’s reasoning in this case (Capital Medical Center v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 1:37 am
[single citation] In a 2004 decision (SOCAN v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
On appeal, the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM upheld the decision concerning the applicability of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), but remitted the case to the Examination Division for re-examination of the applicability of Article 7(3). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:47 am
Kohnstam, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 2:00 am
Sending her for an independent medical examination did not necessarily trigger the direct-threat framework (Felix v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:44 am
American Board of Internal Medicine v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
Justice Zahra explained that the Board of Law Examiners never investigated plaintiff’s FOIA action and this matter had no impact on the Board’s 2010 decision. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 10:23 am
The claim that was granted by the Examining Division had a features that was claimed as "the step xyz is carried out according to a process selected from the group consisting of (i)...., (ii)..., and (iii).... [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
* The Future of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office: Board 28 to meetOn 11 February 2015, Board 28 of the European Patent Office will meet. [read post]
