Search for: "Doe v. Jones, et al"
Results 121 - 140
of 315
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Boston Communications Group, Inc., Nos. 2006–1020 et al., 2006 WL 8071423, *3 (Fed. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
Olah, “My Search for Carbocations and Their Role in Chemistry,” Nobel Lecture (Dec. 8, 1994), quoting George von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (N.Y. 1960); see also McMillan v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
The above case law has limited the scope of relief to a credit against arrears (Fitzgerald et al, supra), or a determination by the Family Court of the amount of a credit for overpayments made directly to the custodial parent and also collected simultaneously by the Support collections Unit (Taddonio et al, supra at 936). [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 7:14 am
World Outreach Church of Murfreesboro Tennessee et al. is a nice illustration of everything that is wrong with the Calder v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
The above case law has limited the scope of relief to a credit against arrears (Fitzgerald et al, supra), or a determination by the Family Court of the amount of a credit for overpayments made directly to the custodial parent and also collected simultaneously by the Support collections Unit (Taddonio et al, supra at 936). [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
Baxter Healthcare challenged the classification, and according to Greenland, the defense experts erroneously interpreted inclusive studies with evidence supporting a conclusion that DEHP does not cause cancer. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
Baxter Healthcare challenged the classification, and according to Greenland, the defense experts erroneously interpreted inclusive studies with evidence supporting a conclusion that DEHP does not cause cancer. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
FAS Technologies, Inc., 138 F. 3d 1448, 1454 (CA Fed. 1998) (en banc) (claim construction does not involve “factual evidentiary findings” (citation and internal quota tion marks omitted)); Lighting Ballast, supra, at 1284 (claim construction has “arguably factual aspects”); Dow Jones & Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:44 am
With this background in mind, let’s look at yesterday’s decision in Jones-Turner, et al. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
New Jersey, et al.. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
GONZALES, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners,v.Angel McClaryRAICH et al.No. 03-1454.Argued Nov. 29, 2004.Decided June 6, 2005. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 10:58 am
Athearn et al., A140971 (Ga Ct. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
The Commission is a body created under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (Act), as amended, 18 U.S.C. 3551 et seq. (1982 ed., Supp. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:03 pm
Thus, for instance, Epstein et al. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:20 am
Jones, 132 S. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:16 am
” See IBEW Local 90 Pension Fund, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
See Kerr, supra, at 404; Brief for Center for Democracy & Technology et al. as Amici Curiae 7–8. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:29 pm
Showing that a criminal act was performed with hair clippers that, at some point in time, crossed state lines does not show that the act in question “affects interstate commerce,” let alone that it has the “substantial effect” required by Lopez, Morrison, et al. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
Jones and the D.C. [read post]
