Search for: "Doe v. Phillips" Results 121 - 140 of 1,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2010, 2:16 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal have listed the appeal which has been lodged by Glenn Mulcaire against the decision of Mr Justice Mann handed down on 17 November 2010 in Phillips v News Group Newspapers ([2010] EWHC 2952 (Ch)). [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
Lord Phillips, Lord Brown and Lord Dyson all analysed the cases concerning Austrian judgements alongside another strand of ECtHR authority relating to cases from Norway Ringvold v Norway (Application No. 34964/97) and Y v Norway (2003) 41 EHRR 87. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:01 am
In the case of Prudential PLC and Prudential (Gibraltar) Limited v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and Phillip Pandolfo (HM Inspector of Taxes) [2009] EWHC 2494, Prudential argued that the existing rule of LLP should be extended to advice on tax law given by accountants. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on two consolidated cases, Florence v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on two consolidated cases, Florence v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:59 am
" Phillips said his finding of racial disparities in capital cases does not mean that prosecutors or juries consciously discriminated. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:46 pm by Guest Author
To Novak’s point, it is true that, in 1920, the Court proclaimed that “size does not determine guilt,” that the FTC expanded its administrative rulemaking, and that the courts enforced the Clayton Act’s prohibitions on certain business conduct. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
I think that it's hard to make much of these statements by themselves; they simply reflect the Court's holding in Employment Division v. [read post]