Search for: "Doe v. Queen" Results 121 - 140 of 1,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2021, 4:29 am by admin
In 2018, the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench held that an agreement that affected only the purchase of a product was not prima facie prohibited by section 45(1) of the Competition Act but could be prohibited under Competition Act, section 90.1 if it substantially lessened or prevented competition (see Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:50 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defense is also mistaken in its reliance on People v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 10:56 am by John Gregory
Does this result come as a surprise to anyone? [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm by WIMS
To the extent that the Amended Verified Complaint does properly allege facts, those facts do not show more than 'a sheer possibility that a defendant has acted unlawfully.' [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “The complaint, as augmented by the affidavit of Singh submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss, sufficiently stated a cause of action for legal malpractice (see CPLR 3211[a][7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88; Doe v Ascend Charter Schs., 181 AD3d 648, 649-650). [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
Phillip Johnson, Defendant. 2009QN068173 Criminal Court Of The City Of New York Queens County Decided on June 24, 2010 Attorney for defendant: Michael Horn Queens Law Associates Attorney for the People: ADA Jonathan Selkowe Elisa S. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justice Rouleau stated in O’Donohue v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:16 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
C.A.)), it is well established that “[s]ilence or mere lack of objection does not constitute a lawful waiver” (see Park v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 6:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff worked as a chef for the defendant, a hotel near Idlewild Airport in Queens. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 9:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens, decided on October 6. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The key case on originality in Canada is CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]