Search for: "Doe v. Regents of the University of California" Results 121 - 140 of 312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Securi [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 4th and 11th Circuits hold; does it instead create a jury question, as the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
While Fisher (and Grutter before it) were litigated primarily under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (which directly governs public universities), the Supreme Court for 40 years now has held that—in the words of Justice Lewis Powell in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In reaching this result, the Grutter Court relied heavily on Justice Lewis Powell’s writing 25 years earlier in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:09 am by Scott Bomboy
Regents of the University of California upheld a nationwide injunction blocking the Trump administration’s efforts to end DACA. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 18-587, Trump v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 405 (“Laurel Heights I”)); and (2) “make[ ] a reasonable effort to substantively connect a project’s air quality impacts to likely health consequences. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
One problem, the Court said, was that of proof of remedial fit: It is sheer speculation how many minority firms there would be in Richmond absent past societal discrimination, just as it was sheer speculation how many minority medical students would have been admitted to the medical school at Davis [in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Supreme Court has in recent decades frowned on racial floors or quotas under so-called strict scrutiny, in cases such as Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]