Search for: "Doe v. The Regents of the University of California"
Results 121 - 140
of 311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2011, 9:14 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2011. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:22 am
(Per the Court, those cases are: (1) County of Inyo v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Regents of the University of California, 184 Cal. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:20 am
” The “diversity” standard in college admissions has gained great popularity because advocates of race-based affirmative action, stymied by the Court since Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Regents of University of California, rejecting the Trump Administration’s attempt to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:44 pm
Strawbridge urged the justices to overrule Grutter and Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm
University of Southern California, 252 F.3d 1059, 1063 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
Colleen V. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
App. 2002)] (ruling that statements at issue in newspaper article relating to software manufacturer’s copyright infringement action against local retailer addressed public concern of software privacy, and therefore retailer was required, despite being a private figure plaintiff, to prove in defamation action that publisher acted with actual malice, i.e., that it acted with actual knowledge of falsity, or with reckless disregard as to the truth or falsity, of the story); Nadel v… [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In his controlling opinion in the 1978 case of Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
Regents of the University of Michigan, et al. (6th Cir., Case Nos. 08-1387/1389/1534 & 09-1111, Nov. 15, 2012) (PDF). [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
The problem is that the reasons cited by academics – like past societal discrimination or the need for more minority professionals – have already been rejected as unconstitutional in Justice Powell’s controlling opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Board of Trustees of the California State University (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 446: There was a lack of substantial evidence to support the conclusion that the impacts to parks would be less than significant. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:40 am
Regents of University of California, held that public employees must pursue appropriate internal administrative remedies before filing a civil action against their employer. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am
-M.Th.D. ten Napel, Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:44 am
Regents of the University of California (1990) 226 Cal.App.3d 129-father denied recovery for emotional distress as the alleged direct victim of a psychotherapist even though he participated in counseling sessions to improve the family relationship. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
The Supreme Court has historically permitted the limited use of race-based college admissions programs, beginning 45 years ago in the Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
Article 10 does not provide a universal justification for inflicting serious, and often unjustified, damage on the reputations of suspects. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
Unless the next two Supreme Court appointees are strong opponents of racial preferences — a most unlikely prospect — the Court’s role since the 1978 Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
On two occasions, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
