Search for: "Does 1-141" Results 121 - 140 of 992
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auditors determined that the board does not have a policy to maintain a reasonable level of fund balance. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 2:34 am by Shawn Barnett (ZA)
  Hedge funds have been declared to be collective investment schemes by Government Notice 141 of 2015. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:30 am by Eric Chiappinelli
But the DGCL does not give the stockholders the same kind of broad management power it gives to the board in §141(a), suggesting that the difference in management power affects the scope of the stockholders’ power to amend bylaws. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Moelis & Company, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently held that a “new wave” stockholder agreement between Moelis & Company (the “Company”) and its founder, CEO, and board chairman, Ken Moelis was invalid under Section 141(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) because it contained “pre-approval rights” over a number of corporate actions, required the board to recommend individuals designated by Moelis for a… [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Moelis & Company, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently held that a “new wave” stockholder agreement between Moelis & Company (the “Company”) and its founder, CEO, and board chairman, Ken Moelis was invalid under Section 141(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) because it contained “pre-approval rights” over a number of corporate actions, required the board to recommend individuals designated by Moelis for a… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The board thereby follows the well-established case law on the interpretation of R 86(4) EPC 1973 see, e.g., T 708/00 [17], T 274/03 [5,6] and T 141/04 [5], it being noted that R 86(4) EPC 1973 has the same wording as R 137(4) (as in force at the date the ED took its decision), which, as from 1 April 2010, is included in R 137(5). [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 11:47 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  S. 744, the massive comprehensive immigration reform bill that passed the Senate over the summer, includes (among other restrictions) an entire section on L-1 visa changes that are patently more restrictive, “Title IV, Subtitle C—L Visa Fraud And Abuse Protections,” as described in the Senate Judiciary Committee’s section-by-section analysis (starting at page 141). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 2:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Phigenixcannot base its injury in fact upon a violation of § 141(c)because it has been permitted to file its appeal, and theexercise of its right to appeal does not necessarily establishthat it possesses Article III standing. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:30 am by Unknown
 "Securitising the Future: Dystopian Migration Discourses in Poland and the Czech Republic," Futures, vol. 141 (Aug. 2022) [open access]- Authors (3) = Norway (1), Czech Rep. (1), Poland (1)"Ukrainian-War Refugees in Poland: Assessment and Recommendations for Crisis Preparedness Education and Implementation," Polish Political Science Yearbook, Ahead of Print, 30 Oct. 2022 [open access]- Author = Poland"The Undermined Role of… [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:20 am by Alessandro Cerri
 Article 7(1)(b) EUTMRThe Board began by noting that 'distinctive character', for the purposes of Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR means that the mark applied for must 'serve to identify the goods or services for which registration is applied for as originating from a particular undertaking, and thus to distinguish those goods from those of other undertakings' (Vorsprung durch Technik, C-398/08 and others).The 'distinctive character' of a Mark must be… [read post]