Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2015, 3:23 am
Samara Bros., 529 US 205, 209-210, 54 USPQ2d 1065, 1066 (2000). [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am
Does the finding that (a disclosure in) a prior art document D1 does not qualify as an accidental anticipation (thus not allowing the use of an undisclosed disclaimer) because it does not fulfill the criterion laid down in G 1/03 that it is so unrelated to and remote from the claimed invention that the skilled person would never have taken it into consideration when making the invention, imply that it is automatically relevant for inventive step? [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:30 pm
Rptr. 3d at 207-08; Z.H., 740 N.W.2d at 653-54. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Originally posted 2022-03-23 10:54:51. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 9:45 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Thursday upheld a district judge’s ruling that California’s controversial “sanctuary state” law does not conflict with federal immigration law. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:06 am
So the ultimate offense doctrine probably does apply here, making Charge II, Spec 3 punishable by only 1 month of confinement rather than 6. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:38 am
Though the gains are not uniform across the continent—and that should come as no surprise for the second largest continent of 54 nation-states, yet certain patterns are evident. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 1:45 pm
North Dakota: 1. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
The basic rules are: 1. [read post]
15 May 2013, 1:10 pm
Research duplication is the inadvertent repetition of research that does not confirm or verify conclusions from prior studies. [read post]
2 May 2017, 4:30 am
"Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 15, no. 1 (March 2017) [contents]- Includes a symposium section on "prosecution challenges that arise in relation to non-removable aliens suspected of serious crimes. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 7:12 am
Celltrion Healthcare Co., Ltd. et al, 1-15-cv-10698 (MAD September 26, 2016, Order) (Wolf, USDJ) [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:29 am
The French Information and Digital Security Experts Club (CESIN) has estimated that 54% of French companies were subject to cyberattacks in 2021,[1] while France Assureurs has put cyberattack risks on top of all other risks for the sixth year in a row.[2] In this context, the Directorate General of the French Treasury has put forward a plan of action with a view to clarifying the cyber-insurance legal framework, better gauging cyber-risks, and enhancing companies’ awareness… [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:24 am
"2.2 Novelty in view of D5 (Article 54(3) EPC)2.2.1 The appellant submitted that, as already acknowledged by the examining division in the appealed decision, document D5 did not disclose the features of the characterising portion of claim 1 as amended, namely the ones of former claims 4 and 5 as well as former claims 17 and 18, i.e. features (c) and (d).2.2.2 The appealed decision contained novelty objections under Article 54(3) EPC with respect to indep [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
The statement by a majority does not equate to unanimous approval by all parties. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:33 am
Cir. 1999).For the foregoing reasons, we sustain the rejection of claims 1-11, 17-24, 26-43, 45-54, 56-58, 60-63, 66, 67, and 69-75 as anticipated byKuechler.IPBiz notes the following:Since we sustain the rejection of claims 1-11, 17-24, 26-43, 45-54, 56-58, 60-63, 66, 67, and 69-75 as anticipated by Kuechler, we also sustaintheir rejection as unpatentable over Kuechler. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:19 am
Rule 54(d)(1) provides, in relevant part, that “Unless a federal statute, these rules, or a court order provides otherwise, costs—other than attorney’s fees—should be allowed to the prevailing party,” the appeals court pointed out, explaining that even if a federal statute does not specifically authorize recovery of costs in a particular case, Rule 54(d)(1) independently authorizes district courts to award costs to prevailing… [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 2:17 am
The examining division raised further objections under Articles 123(2), 84, 54(1),(3) EPC, and, after being requeste to do so, took as decision according to the state of the file - to refuse. [read post]
31 May 2006, 6:06 am
Mathis,109 Ohio St.3d 54, 2006-Ohio-855, 846 N.E.2d 1. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Legal Services Market Ray Worthy Campbell 9 NYU Journal of Law and Business 1 (2012) Excerpt: pp. 52-54 [Footnotes are omitted but are available in the full article online via the link above.] [read post]
