Search for: "Does 1-59"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2012, 8:55 am
A Santa Ana vehicular manslaughter charge does not require that the accused consumed alcohol before getting behind the wheel. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
" * See 59 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,785. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:01 pm
In this revocation appeal Board 3.2.02 inter alia examined claim 1 of the fourth auxiliary request as to its compliance with A 53(c). [read post]
4 May 2019, 2:55 pm
Not only does the FDA’smandate disclose every limitation of claim 1, but it is theonly prior art reference that discloses the 0.001% oxymorphone ABUK limitation. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:27 am
But does the answer matter at all in the UK? [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
" (para 51)Article 3(1)(e)(ii) only refers to manner in which goods functionThe Court then turned to the third question and held that Article 3(1)(e)(ii) of the Trade Mark Directive, under which registration may be refused of signs consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result, must be interpreted as referring only to the manner in which the goods at issue function and it does not apply to the manner in which… [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:46 am
Because … 1. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 12:10 pm
The Plaintiff declined this offer and proceeded to trial seeking over $1 million in damages. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:04 pm
The age 59 1/2 category does not come into play. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:29 am
Does 1-59, 2011 WL 292128 (S.D. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 10:08 am
In FY2010, the appeal brief conference resulted in a decision to file an examiner answer in 59% of cases. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 10:16 am
However, Chief Justice Gomez explained that courts may grant Rule 59(e) relief only where: (1) an intervening change in the law has occurred; (2) new evidence not previously available has emerged; or (3) the need to correct a clear error of law or prevent a manifest injustice arises. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:16 am
He discusses the cases where a plaintiff invokes rules of substantive law in his submission of action and where he or she does not – according to the AG, in the latter scenario, his method does not change fundamentally. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 6:33 pm
¶59 On this issue, we concur with the referee's conclusion [that Inglimo did not violate the rule]. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 5:00 pm
[1] Melissa Fuesting, Stephanie Hale, and Paul Yakoboski, Faculty Retirement Patterns and COVID-19: Impacts, Challenges and Opportunities, CUPA-HR Webinar, May 26, 2021. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:17 am
This argument amounted to mere disagreement with the court's ruling which does not support a Rule 59(e) motion. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 9:07 pm
J.A. 59. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:00 pm
Labels as Evidence of a 'Particular Social Group'," Arizona Law Review, vol. 59, no. 1 (2017) [full-text] Related post:- Regional Focus: United States (26 May 2017)Tagged Publications. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:25 am
The added 10 percent tax does not apply to nontaxable withdrawals. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm
However, Indiana law does not prohibit the act of surrogacy itself, and recent court rulings have been favorable to surrogacy. [read post]
