Search for: "Dow Chemical Co., Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
”  Summary judgment affirmed.American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 4:52 am by Robin Shea
Kimberly Hartman, a paralegal for Dow Chemical, was terminated about six weeks after returning to work from FMLA leave. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:43 pm
-China Business Council, which represents about 250 companies that do business with China, including Dow Chemical Co, Ford Motor Co and Apple Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:14 pm
In Dow Chemical, we held that, under both the pre-1999 version of § 102(g)(2) and the current version of the statute, which reads "the invention was made in this country by another inventor . . . [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm
The court stated in its judgment that DMG relied in particular on Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75.In Jameel Lord Phillips MR stated [at 54]:“An abuse of process is of concern not merely to the parties but to the court. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
The FDA guidance advances the concept of a “Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC),” to set an “acceptable intake,” for chemical impurities that pose negligible risks of toxicity or carcinogenicity.[8] The agency describes its risk assessment methodology as “very conservative,” given the frequently unproven assumptions made to reach a quantification of an “acceptable intake”: “The methods upon which the TTC is based are generally… [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Medtronic, Inc., 231 F.3d 216, 230 (6th Cir. 2001).Kemp concluded that the purported "violations" before it were not violations at all - but merely reflected Plaintiffs' incorrect reading of FDA requirements. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Dow Chemical In February 2013, a federal court jury in Kansas returned a verdict in favor of a class of purchasers of urethanes for $400 million (trebled to $1.2 billion). [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(IPKat) (IPKat) IPO launches ‘Supply Chain Toolkit’ best practice toolkit for avoiding fake goods entering business supply chains (IPKat) Welsh patent applications: the results are in (IPKat)   United States US General Government blocks release of documents on secret IP enforcement treaty, ACTA (EFF) Potential names for Obama IP team swirl; WTO IP Chief ‘imminent’ (Intellectual Property Watch) John W Thompson leading candidate for Commerce Secretary… [read post]