Search for: "Dupont v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 6:06 pm
The court’s opinion cited cases in the United States Supreme Court in which NALA filed an amicus brief, Missouri v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:15 pm
Daniel Dupont, a local pulmonary physician. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:56 am
Co-authored by Kara Goodwin and Noah Finkel Pending before the United States Supreme Court is a petition for writ of certiorari asking the Court to determine whether an employer may use payments for bona fide meal periods as an offset/credit against compensable work time. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The opposer contended that the mark SOCK IT UP was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, and therefore JY Instyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 9:46 am
On July 2, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided United Steel v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:29 am
DuPont Nemours & Co., W.D.N.Y., No. 07-CV-0267S(Sr) Weist v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 1:16 pm
Supreme Court held in Cyan v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:43 pm
Google itself has an interesting discussion of its new Google Scholar legal opinions and journals search engine, now in Beta, on its blog:As many of us recall from our civics lessons in school, the United States is a common law country. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:33 pm
The Board focused on the second duPont factor. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
(b)(1); DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
International Trade Commission, et al., No. 16-428 (Whether Section 337(a)(1)(A) permits the ITC to adjudicate claims regarding trade secret misappropriation alleged to have occurred outside the United States.) [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
Grant may continue to litigate his wrongful-death lawsuitNURSING HOME MORTGAGOR CHEATED HUD ON LOANS; SUIT SEEKS $77 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Woolsey’s decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
" Recot Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:19 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reiterated this point in Jackman Financial Corp. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
In City of Providence v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:27 am
It ruled that the agent was entitled to qualified immunity on the Fifth Amendment question and that the Fourth Amendment did not apply because the youth had no significant connection with the United States at the time. [read post]
