Search for: "EASTERN EXPRESS v. UNITED STATES" Results 121 - 140 of 633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
Action No. 4:11cv45 (Apr. 24, 2012), in which the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that "liking" a Facebook page did not constitute speech protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney’s fees and necessary expenses, requesting $89,310.08 that included court costs, legal fees, and travel costs between Thailand and the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 5:46 am by Gregory Dell
” The Appellate Court expressed some frustration with United, stating “on appeal, United continues in its selective characterization of the SSA’s decision. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:14 am by Editor Charlie
In reading the opinion, I wondered if this was the same Eastern District of Virginia judge that botched the fair use test in Philpot v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm by Quinta Jurecic
As to Miller’s position that Congress has not authorized Mueller’s work by statute, the court simply pointed to United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Robert J. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
  And such laws cannot survive even the less stringent standard of review articulated in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
”  Yep, that leaves the Department of Justice, arguing on behalf of the United States of America, as one of the outliers. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment on all of Slusher's claims. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am by Amy Howe
”  Last fall the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]