Search for: "EEOC v. Group Health Plan"
Results 121 - 140
of 200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Arizona District Court Certifies Class Of Lesbian And Gay State Employees In Denial Of Benefits Case
27 Dec 2013, 7:22 am
Maechtlen On December 23, 2013, in Diaz, et al. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:20 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Liggett Group, Inc. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:10 pm
See Perez v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:25 pm
If you remember back to 2012 you might remember the big fight over religious organizations and their health insurance plans and the disagreement over whether they should be required to offer contraceptive coverage. [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:51 pm
Despite ACA’ amendments to HIPAA’s bona fide wellness program rules and the 11th Circuit’s rejection of an EEOC challenge in Broward County v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 9:00 am
The DSM-V is the first update to the APA's manual in thirteen years and includes updated criteria for mental disorders as well as recognizes new disorders that have been diagnosed by mental health professionals. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
, Michael Sipos and Gary Smith v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:45 am
Therefore, the first recommendation is to develop such a plan. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In this instance, contraceptive coverage without cost sharing would be provided to plan participants and beneficiaries through individual health insurance policies, separate from the group policy through which all other coverage would be provided to plan participants and beneficiaries. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
Employers and other self-insured group health plan sponsors and health insurers, adjust your budgets and prepare to open up your wallets to pay additional fees mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”). [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:35 am
The recent judgement against the two men in Solis v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:45 pm
See Solis v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 1:15 am
Seff v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:45 am
In this regard, it noted that the program (i) was part of a contract with Coventry Healthcare to provide Broward County’s employees with a group health plan, (ii) was only available to group plan enrollees and (iii) was otherwise communicated to be a part of the County’s group health plan in employee materials. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:48 pm
There is a catch--the EEOC has not made its position known on how incentives or penalties and "voluntary" participation are impacted by such programs.In Seff v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:48 pm
There is a catch--the EEOC has not made its position known on how incentives or penalties and "voluntary" participation are impacted by such programs.In Seff v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 11:41 am
Participation in the wellness program was not a condition for enrollment in the County’s group health insurance plan. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm
Even though the plan document did not expressly reference the wellness program, the Court reasoned that since it was only available to health plan enrollees and was sponsored by the same insurer that provided the group coverage, it was part of the health plan. [read post]
