Search for: "Edwards v. I. N. S" Results 121 - 140 of 471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2015, 5:28 am
At one point during the encounter, [he] appeared to receive a phone call, and he responded to the person on the phone: `Yeah, I'm with her right now, she's scared, but there's not really nothing here I could charge her for, so we will wrap things up. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
A close read of the brief, however, shows that Rothman’s critique of the assumption is equivocal. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm by Steve Bainbridge
S. 765, 778, n. 14, and extended this protection to the context of political speech, see, e.g., NAACP v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Election Law Blog, Edward Foley offers the third in a series of essays discussing Benisek v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:33 am by Susan Brenner
This, according to the Court of Appeals opinion, is how the case began: [O]n May 4, 2007, Eric Edwards, . . . [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
  Although I sympathize with the petition, I believe the Federal Circuit got the statutory interpretation correct. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm
She cites ElliottEstate v. [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Bruce, Cornell Law School; Edward W. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
Bennet, 267 Wis. 2d 919, 944 (App. 2003). [3] Edwards v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:19 am by Brian Shiffrin
Penal Law § 60.01(2)(d) provides that “[i]n any case where the court imposes a sentence of imprisonment not in excess of sixty days, for a misdemeanor . . . it may also impose a sentence of probation . . . [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm by David Kopel
The first quote, from Loan Ass’n v. [read post]