Search for: "Edwards v. Means" Results 121 - 140 of 1,936
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2023, 2:35 am by Aaron L. Nielson
The facts are complicated, but for the Court, Judge Edwards (joined by Judges Pillard and Pan) concluded that the Commission erred as follows: Next, we have Al-Hela v. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 2:35 am by Aaron L. Nielson
The facts are complicated, but for the Court, Judge Edwards (joined by Judges Pillard and Pan) concluded that the Commission erred as follows: Next, we have Al-Hela v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Although the Mocambique principle means that British courts can’t decide validity of foreign patents, the principle did not apply in this case. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Guest Author
   Take another example: the Clean Power Plan overturned by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:33 pm by Michael Oykhman
Section 122 is a dual/hybrid offence, which means the crown prosecutor can proceed by summary or by indictable offence. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
Certainly in his lifetime, Selikoff attracted harsh and vituperative attacks, some of which were mean-spirited and even anti-semitic. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 2:48 pm by John Floyd
”   The CCA answered this question in the negative on February 15, 2023, in Edwards v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am by Andy Wright
Rehnquist, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, to Edward L. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 8:00 am by Eleonora Rosati
We will explore the legal and practical meaning and consider if there are better ways to decide trade mark disputes)Moderator: Darren MealePanellists:  Rhys Edwards, Senior Legal Counsel, Monzo BankChristine Wang, Legal Director, Marshall AmplificationSimon Malynicz KC, Barrister, Hogarth ChambersChehrazade Chemcham, Vice President, Head of Brand Rights, Haleon18:15-19:30 – Drinks and canapesTickets are strictly limited and available on a first come, first… [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 1 February 2023, the Federal Court of New South Wales gave judgment on meaning for the publications identified in the amended statement of claim in Russell v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2023] FCA 38. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:27 am by Emma Snell
Helene Cooper and Edward Wong report for the New York Times. [read post]