Search for: "Eisenberg v. Eisenberg"
Results 121 - 140
of 280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2013, 11:08 am
Kitch, Graham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:48 am
Carter andRyan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:48 am
Carter andRyan v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:37 pm
Carter and Ryan v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:48 am
B-NY: Sentimental value of prop. held by family for generations doesnt outweigh benefit to crs. from sale per 363(h). http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Beck-BK-EDNY-Eisenberg-9-6-11.doc … B-FL: No admin. priority for severance pay arising from prepet. empl. agr. just bec employee was employed postpetition. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/RobbStuckyLtd-BK-MD-FL-Delano-9-7-11.doc … B-AZ: Legal mal. cplt. alleging… [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:54 am
The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law since he failed to show that the plaintiff was unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of her legal malpractice cause of action (see Mueller v Fruchter, 71 AD3d 650, 651; Velie v Ellis Law, P.C., 48 AD3d 674, 675; Pedro v Walker, 46 AD3d 789, 790; Eisenberger v Septimus, 44 AD3d 994, 995; Shopsin v Siben & Siben, 268 AD2d 578,… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:29 pm
AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Eisenberg, 60 AD3d 77 (1st Dept 2009), and the seminal New York case on the subject of the demand requirement, Marx v. [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Eisenberg, 60 AD3d 77 (1st Dept 2009), and the seminal New York case on the subject of the demand requirement, Marx v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:58 am
2011AP163, 2011AP1603 In re the marriage of: Eisenberg v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:33 am
In Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 9:49 am
Eisenberg, et al., 2012 U.S. [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:45 am
Hill NAACP v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
BRUGMANN, Petitioner, v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
The original article on which this revised version is based was originally written before the initial decisio in FDIC v Perry was reported (about which decision, refer here). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:15 am
Santucci Joseph V. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:15 am
Santucci Joseph V. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:29 pm
Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
