Search for: "English v. Stevens"
Results 121 - 140
of 385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 3:42 am
Interestingly, in light of the Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Lilly having been handed down after the first instance judgment in the present proceedings, Regeneron appears to have argued that even if Kymab was right on construction, there was still infringement under the newly-conceived English law doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 6:50 am
Silver McCarter & English, LLPRenaissance Centre405 N. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Justice [Indiana Supreme Court] Steven H. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:56 am
And for the Second Amendment, which was rooted in the English Declaration of Rights a century before the Bill of Rights was ratified, the odds would likely be steeper. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm
Indeed, a far better predictor of a justice’s vote is the justice’s ideology, rather than whether a justice uses a methodology like originalism or not to decide a case (think of Scalia and Justice John Paul Stevens in the District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
The American colonies embraced the same approach to abortion as the English common law, and abortion before quickening was both common and legal. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am
The first was Rosales-Mireles v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:40 pm
This morning the Cal Supremes issued Kurwa v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm) H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm), also demonstrates potentially important differences between New York and English law. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm) H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm), also demonstrates potentially important differences between New York and English law. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm
At a securities conference in October, Enforcement Co-Director Steven Peikin noted that the Commission’s strategy is necessary to accommodate the new fiscal environment, stating, “it may be the case that we have to be selective and bring a few cases to send a broader message rather than sweep the entire field. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 6:19 pm
Two of the dissenters in Hamdi v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:23 pm
At a securities conference in October, Enforcement Co-Director Steven Peikin noted that the Commission’s strategy is necessary to accommodate the new fiscal environment, stating, “it may be the case that we have to be selective and bring a few cases to send a broader message rather than sweep the entire field. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie looks at Digital Realty Trust Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:04 am
Herlihy and Steven A. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:20 am
Akpan v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
A number of important media law cases have been decided by the English courts in the past 12 months including Begg v BBC [2016] EWHC 2688 (QB) – see our case comment by Aidan Wills. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
We had a post by Steven BarnettSimon Neville who has worked for both papers, has written an open letter to Mail editor Paul Dacre. [read post]
