Search for: "Environmental Control Systems, Inc. v. Long"
Results 121 - 140
of 210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm
The 2008 decision in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders clarified that the duty of the directors is to the corporation. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
<> Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Sierra Club v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
| Dutch diverge with English as Novartis prevails on Zoledronic Acid in Netherlands | Slogan and TMs | The coffee capsule wars | Declining public trust in innovation | IPEC’s ruling in Global Flood Defence Systems & Another v Van den Noort Innovations BV & Others | Again on CJEU ruling in Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters | Biotech financing: the risk components, ‘going long’ and patents as knowledge currency. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm
Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“ANPR”) on “Hydraulic Fracturing Chemicals and Mixtures Under the Toxic Substances Control Act” came to a close. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
This indeterminate-sentencing system was supplemented by the utilization of parole, by which an offender was returned to society under the "guidance and control" of a parole officer. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
That systemicity (cf. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
The Delaware Supreme Court stirred up quite a bit of controversy earlier this year in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
Under the terms of these Supplier Code of Conduct, Manufacturers agree to a number of terms that affect the way they operate their businesses—including terms with respect to compliance with local law, labor conditions, worker safety and plant facilities, environmental sustainability, transparency, anti-corruption and community relations. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Around the same time, the Regional Water Quality Control Board took interest in the site due to downstream stream contamination, potentially as a result of runoff from the horse and cattle facilities. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:41 pm
Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. (1974) the Supreme Court ruled that cable providers were rabbit ear antennas which did not infringe on broadcasters’ copyrights. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
However, it does cast a long shadow over the proceedings. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Around the same time, the Regional Water Quality Control Board took interest in the site due to downstream stream contamination, potentially as a result of runoff from the horse and cattle facilities. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The first component is the environmental assessment of the Resource Management Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 10:11 pm
The Pollution Control Board, No. 115473 -- Issue Presented: May a party challenging the certification of a system as a pollution control facility appeal directly to the Appellate Court pursuant to the Environmental Protection Act, 415 ILCS 5/41(a), after its challenge is rejected by the Illinois Pollution Control Board? [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
Schmalfeldt has long made it clear that writing anything bad about Brett Kimberlin will have consequences: So: onto the enemies list I go. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:03 am
Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here). 33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental ProfessionalsWaste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The Court, referring to its 2007 Grand Chamber judgment in Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
In addition, Havner requires that a plaintiff show ‘that he or she is similar to [the subjects] in the studies’ and that ‘other plausible causes of the injury or condition that could be negated [are excluded] with reasonable certainty’.40” 347 S.W.3d at 265 (quoting from Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Charles Calmbacher, falsely claiming that he found widespread environmental problems, when in fact he did not; Plaintiffs’ lawyers and consultants ghost wrote the report of the Court’s supposedly “independent” expert on damages, Mr. [read post]
