Search for: "Evers v. Board of Medical Examiners" Results 121 - 140 of 206
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
The Board, however, pointed out that because the goods are in part identical (candles), that factor weighed heavily against applicant. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:20 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
Second, as a member of the advisory board of the Social Science Genetics Association Consortium (SSGAC), I advise data holders about ethical and regulatory aspects of their research, including issues of re-identification. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:31 am
The WCJ reviewed deposition testimony of two doctors who had performed Independent Medical Examinations (more accurately known as Defense Medical Exams), and also a deposition of Claimant’s treating neurologist. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
I’ve done so by first surveying §602 case law and then examining several of the defenses raised in actions involving consumer goods. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
I’ve done so by first surveying §602 case law and then examining several of the defenses raised in actions involving consumer goods. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K Sanction On… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  To be sure, Bickel was more than willing  to defend Brown v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm
Infant plaintiff’s mother (herein “plaintiff-mother”) is a physician Board Certified in Internal Medicine. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
  Disputes are first refereed by the very nature of the adversary system and its rules of evidence and cross-examination. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:59 pm by TDot
Constitutional Law: Kelo v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Steve Honig
”  If someone who is not insured requires healthcare, and he does not have insurance, by law he cannot be denied medical care and ultimately that care is paid for by all Americans as part of the interstate commerce of healthcare. [read post]