Search for: "Frye v Frye"
Results 121 - 140
of 683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
Several years ago, Florida lawmakers decided to enact a measure that would alter F.S. 90.702 (testimony by experts) and F.S. 90.704 (basis of opinion testimony by experts), forgoing the so-called “Frye standard” (so named for the 1923 case of Frye v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm
Prior to 1993, the determination of whether scientific evidence should be allowed followed the “Frye” method, so named for the 1923 case of Frye v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm
Frye “The First Hard Case: ‘Zeran v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:58 am
Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
After a brief discussion of the long-recognized rule of Frye v United States — in that expert testimony must be based on scientific principles or procedures and is admissible only after a principle or procedure has gained general acceptance in its specified field — the court swiftly deconstructed Dr. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), and to no longer apply the standard in Frye v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 7:01 am
In Delisle v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 1:35 pm
In Savage v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 1:49 pm
The Maryland Court of Appeals’ recent opinion in Rochkind v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 1:06 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 7:24 pm
Porter v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:10 am
Supreme Court ruling in Daubert v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Workers’ compensation — Expert testimony — Frye-Reed hearing In March 2013, Alford Mundy (“Appellee”) fell and injured his knee. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
On October 20, 2016, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Motorola Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
On October 20, 2016, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Motorola Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 10:18 am
Additional Resources: Nease v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:10 am
We went from being a “Frye” state (based on the 1923 precedent in Frye v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 8:18 pm
Frye has published "Incidental Intellectual Property" in the Entertainment and Sports Lawyer, v. 33 (Winter 2017). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm
I truly enjoyed each of the presentations of my fellow panelists: Guy Rub, Brian Frye, Rothman, and Sharon Sandeen. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 9:45 am
Civil litigation — Causal-connection opinion — Frye-Reed hearing In this consolidated appeal, appellant, Baltimore County (“County”), appeals the the Circuit Court for Baltimore County’s denial of its request for a Frye-Reed hearing on the methodologies and theories supporting the causal connection opinion of appellee Dora Waddy’s expert. [read post]
