Search for: "GARNER v. SCOTT"
Results 121 - 140
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2022, 8:30 am
To play Devil's Advocate, one could argue there's not necessarily anything wrong with a seller garnering secondary meaning for a feature (e.g. the Coke bottle shape) by using a design patent, and then using that secondary meaning to protect, specifically, those marketing features that consumers come to see as identifying the seller and distinguishing them from others. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
Milward v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Rev. 1939 (April 2011) Scott Dodson, The Complexity Of Jurisdictional Clarity, 97 Va. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Rev. 1939 (April 2011) Scott Dodson, The Complexity Of Jurisdictional Clarity, 97 Va. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:24 pm
Question Raised: Which Way Did the Money Flow? [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 8:38 am
Editor’s Note: Lawfare is not a public health law site, and normally, we would not run a piece on food and drug law and the authority of the FDA. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:52 am
Coleman served as co-counsel with Thurgood Marshall in Brown v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
Merrill was accused of using his office and his consulting firm to garner more than $1 million from trade groups and companies at a time when he was both a lawmaker and a consultant. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Despite some criticism from Democrats, she garnered bipartisan support at her confirmation hearing. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm
The Supreme Court has long emphasized, as it explained in Flast v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
The exact contours of the administration’s thinking remain somewhat clouded by its refusal to release the legal memoranda that underlie both its public statements and the leaked “White Paper” that has recently garnered so much attention. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
She was poised even when she was being peppered with questions from all sides of the bench, as she was in defending an ultimately unsuccessful position in her first argument, in Begay v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Texas, Collens v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
Aleksandr V. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
The judgment continued: “Such were the Burges font in Re St Peter’s, Draycott, [2009] Fam 93; the Oldrid Scott chancel screen in Duffield; and the Flemish armet in In re St Lawrence, Wootton [2014] Arches Court. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:45 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
Any attempt to garner the public benefit that might be achieved by releasing investigative journalists from the strictures of libel law risks absolving less reputable scribes of liability for naked intrusions and falsehoods. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm
While the circuit court split continues to widen regarding the interpretation of unauthorized access under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the recent decision in U.S. v. [read post]