Search for: "Gist v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2016, 5:57 am by Jonathan Abel
Although Supreme Court cases like United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am by MBettman
At issue are these three certified questions of state law from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division: What is the statute of limitations for claims of negligent misidentification? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:47 am
Yet, as was the case in Roper, the United States is isolated among other nations of the world as the only country that imposes this sentence on a juvenile, for any crime. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:03 pm by Larry
United States (President Bident and a bunch of other named officials are also defendants).The gist of the decision is simple enough. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:34 pm by Larry
Of course, the 1983 case was under the old Tariff Schedule of the United States. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:57 am by The Charge
United States, 353 U.S. 657 (1957) in which it afforded broad discovery opportunities in federal criminal cases. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:31 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 6/21/10Cite: Allison v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:31 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Harrison was a significant case in the evolution of media law in Illinois and the United States, underscoring the importance of a free and independent press in holding public officials accountable and informing the public. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 10:12 am by Steve Lubet
” Eventually the issue came before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
  This is not to suggest that the current cultural revolution in the United states (in particular) or in the liberal democratic camp (on general) ought to be faulted. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 9:44 pm by Georgialee Lang
I guess I’ve been lucky because I have never had to do a trial or hearing where the opposing party acted in person, “pro se”, as they call it in the United States. [read post]