Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 121 - 140
of 67,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2007, 5:31 am
The seminar was given by Pankaj Pathak and Alex Munro, both of 2 Paper Buildings.It was explained that Stack v Dowden has cleared up some uncertainties, for example that where the deeds are silent and there is no express declaration of trust, a conveyance to joint cohabitees indicates both a legal and beneficial joint tenancy* unless and until the contrary is proved, and that to depart from this starting-point the facts would have to be very unusual. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:24 pm
Given the Claimants' bills of costs totalled £104,707,772.72 it is perhaps not surprising that this is a fairly lengthy judgment. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:15 am
In Bradley v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 1:03 pm
RCA Corp. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 12:00 am
ABSTRACT: A dominant firm undertakes a given business practice that is regulated by an antitrust enforcer by the... [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
ABSTRACT: A dominant firm undertakes a given business practice that is regulated by an antitrust enforcer by the... [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 12:00 am
ABSTRACT: A dominant firm undertakes a given business practice that is regulated by an antitrust enforcer by the... [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:22 pm
Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc, the journal's on-line companion, has just published a roundtable on Dukes v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
ABSTRACT: A dominant firm undertakes a given business practice that is regulated by an antitrust enforcer by the... [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:23 am
Joseph County, Wilson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:30 am
Wasa International Insurance Co Ltd v Lexington Insurance Co; AGF Insurance Ltd v Same [2008] EWCA Civ 150; WLR (D) 69 “Where the wording in a contract of reinsurance was the same as or equivalent to that in the underlying contract of insurance, the two contracts should be given the same construction unless there were clear indications to the contrary. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:24 pm
Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:02 am
Employee's termination affirmed based on her failure to show that the reasons given by her employer for dismissal were pretextualHughes v City of Bethlehem, USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket #07-2349, Decided October 2, 2008After Catherine Hughes was terminated from her employment with the City of Bethlehem, she sued, alleging employment discrimination based on her gender in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; employment discrimination based on her having a… [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:27 am
The Fifth District Court of Appeal ruled Friday in Cortese v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 8:55 am
Defendants cannot be given a mandatory minimum sentence for refusing to submit to a warrantless blood test. 2.) more » [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 4:00 am
In a 94-page opinion in Tatel v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 8:05 pm
Case: Milller v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:57 am
Bragg v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:03 am
But I was amazed to read the account in The New Yorker about Dale Carpenter’s new book on the factual background and litigation history of Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Ars Technica reports that the judge in Virgin v. [read post]
