Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 121 - 140
of 7,479
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2011, 9:46 am
This was the first published state court decision in California regarding employment arbitration agreements since the United States Supreme Court's groundbreaking decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:01 pm
(Brack v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 5:44 am
Moreno, will come as good news. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:09 am
The company accepts the shipments at the docks, stores the merchandise, and then has its drivers deliver the goods throughout the state of California. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:00 pm
The case, filed May 1, 2017, isEagles Ltd v Hotel California Baja LLC et al, U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:26 am
Whether a contract for the purchase of goods entered into, and fully performed by, an Indian Tribe outside the exterior boundaries of the state in which the Tribe’s reservation is located can constitutionally subject the out of state vendor to the specific personal jurisdiction of the buyer’s state, under state laws purporting to regulate the sale of those goods in the buyer’s state.2. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 1:22 am
That’s not good enough for the state legislature which enacted a new law mandating employers to make reasonable efforts to provide a room or other location in close proximity to the employee’s work area, other than a bathroom. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
Brown, Jr. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 2:45 pm
(Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate District, January 21, 2020, Techno Lite, Inc., v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 11:23 am
In August 2012, the district court certified a class of “[a]ll persons who, during the applicable statute of limitations, were employed by Wal-Mart in the State of California in the position of Cashier. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 12:37 pm
Yes, this is the same Crest v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
Good Georgia Lawyer's favorite advocacy group Public Citizen states that this is a dangerous decision which has impacts beyond consumer cases. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 8:17 am
On December 19th, we wrote an article about a poorly decided California Supreme Court decision, Van Horn v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 11:39 am
In Miller Marital Deduction Trust, et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided Fernandez v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:33 am
But the “standing” issue is currently being decided by the United States Supreme Court in another case from California, Toby Douglas v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:06 am
As previously discussed in other posts (here and here), California state courts have created a collage of varying conclusions as to whether Gentry remains good law after Concepcion. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:32 pm
The AEP v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:14 am
The landmark Alexander Van Horn v. [read post]
