Search for: "Grand Jury Subpoena v. US"
Results 121 - 140
of 555
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2020, 7:30 am
” Consider the issuance of a grand jury subpoena to a witness in a public corruption case in which the subject of the investigation is a member of Congress standing for election. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:35 am
VanceDecision Date: July 9, 2020 The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that US President Donald Trump must comply with a grand jury subpoena for his personal financial records, rejecting his claim of absolute immunity while in office. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Vance, the Court held that a state prosecutor acting on behalf of a grand jury can subpoena records of the President. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 12:36 pm
President Trump’s lawyers have amended a lawsuit filed in federal court to block a grand jury subpoena for his tax records, writes the Post. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 8:44 am
For more on this, see In re Grand Jury Subpoena (Judith Miller) (D.C. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:38 am
The Court Got the Trump Subpoena Cases Exactly Backwards By Robert Black, Writer and Legal Scholar Robert Black looks at the Supreme Court’s decisions in the Trump subpoena cases—Trump v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
As Pete Williams of NBC News notes, the justices took a different approach with regard to a Manhattan grand jury’s subpoena for Trump’s financial records; last week, the court allowed that case to head back to a lower court on an expedited basis. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
And he rejected the president’s argument that a state grand jury should have to satisfy a heightened standard before subpoenaing a president’s personal records. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
In 2019, acting on behalf of a grand jury, New York County District Attorney Cy Vance served a subpoena on Mazars, USA, the president’s accounting firm, seeking various financial records. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:19 pm
But, like every other recipient of a grand jury subpoena, Trump remains free to argue that the subpoena is unduly burdensome or was issued in bad faith. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
As the court recognized in Vance, Trump’s argument for immunity was deeply ahistorical — presidents have been investigated and made to give evidence many times before (and here, we should remember, the New York grand jury subpoenaed a third party, not the president). [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Vance — involving a Manhattan grand jury’s access to Trumps’s records — is “a stunning defeat for Mr. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:08 pm
The simpler of the two cases decided today was the New York grand jury case, Trump v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 12:18 pm
The Supreme Court sent the New York grand jury subpoena as well as the congressional subpoenas back for further consideration in the lower courts, so the President still can argue against enforcement in both cases. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
At The World and Everything in It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses two oral arguments in cases involving President Donald Trump’s efforts to shield his financial records, including his tax returns, from subpoenas issued to his accountant and lenders by a New York grand jury and three congressional committees. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am
The executive branch believes that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) does not apply to otherwise-authorized, military cyber activity, and the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision on the CFAA in Van Buren v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:05 am
Yesterday the court issued a unanimous opinion in Opati v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:17 am
Vance, which involve the president’s efforts to shield his financial records from subpoenas issued to his accountant and lenders by three congressional committees and a New York grand jury, “[t]he court’s power over the presidency is being tested while the justices face the frustrations of remote working. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:56 am
Vance, which involve the president’s efforts to shield his financial records from subpoenas issued to his accountant and lenders by three congressional committees and a New York grand jury, that “Mr Trump may win a majority in Trump v Mazars—keeping his finances out of the newspapers, for now[, b]ut he seems likely to lose Trump v Vance, the clash over the New York subpoena (if so, only the grand jury… [read post]
