Search for: "Grant v. Scott et al"
Results 121 - 140
of 283
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2015, 11:17 am
The United States District Court of the Northern District of Florida made a landmark decision in Brenner, et al. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:27 pm
In this post, I want to focus on this curious passage from the Harkin, et al., op-ed: None of us contemplated that the bill as enacted could be misconstrued to limit financial help only to people in states opting to directly run health insurance marketplaces. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
John et al. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:35 am
Grant, et al., Court of Appeals Case No. 68345-4-1 (Wash. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Thus, for instance, Cao, et al., Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 3:48 am
Explains Scott:The Long Arm of Canadian LawIn a ground-breaking decision (Equustek Solutions Inc. v Jack et al, 2014 BCSC 1063) the British Columbia Supreme Court has issued an interim injunction against a third party, Google, ordering it to stop indexing or referencing certain websites in its search results, not just in Canada but everywhere. [read post]
31 May 2014, 4:57 am
Laborers Local 236, AFL-CIO, et al. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
Despite “the difficulty & awkwardness of operating by force on the collective will of a State,” armed federal intervention in state affairs must be permitted.[4]During the Convention, on three different occasions, Madison tried to grant the federal government this absolute “negative” (what we now call a veto) over all state legislation. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:36 am
Katakis, et. al., Corrected Notice of Motion and Memorandum of Points and Authorities 2 (May 5, 2014). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Scott Paper Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 7:54 am
Ali Hosseini, et al., 2013 IL App (1st) 122804-U. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
Scott Weigle, John Moore, II, et al., Nos. 12-3024, 12-3025 (7th Cir., September 6, 2013). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
., Appellant, v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Justice O'Connor cited it in the plurality opinion in Hamdi et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
VERONICA BONCROFT and SCOTT RUBINCHIK, Appellees. 4th District.Arbitration -- Trial court erred in denying motion to dismiss and to compel arbitration on ground that there are five other cases between the parties in the same probate division, where this case is based on an operating agreement containing an arbitration clause, and the other five cases are notBARRY BERK, et al., Appellants, vs. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:10 pm
District Court Judge Richard Lazzara in that case [Myers et al v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
Consequently, it held that they did not constitute "same parties" within the meaning of Article 27 of Council Regulation 44/2001, as their interests could not be deemed identical nor indissociable (see Case C-351/96, Drouot v CMI Industrial Sites et Al.). [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm
Instead, this 40% magnitude of reduction results only in a loss of chance which is not compensable in medical malpractice cases (See: Cottrelle et al v. [read post]
