Search for: "HUMPHREYS v. DAY"
Results 121 - 140
of 228
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Graetz & Greenhouse: Ron, you don’t mention Woodward and Armstrong’s The Brethren – controversial in its day (and a huge best-seller) that actually holds up very well. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Case law has long held that an employee may not be found guilty of acts of alleged misconduct or incompetence that have not been charged [see, for example, Shuster v Humphrey, 156 NY 231].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_06924.htm_________________The Discipline Book, - A 458 page guide to disciplinary actions involving public officers and employees. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:38 am
Humphrey, and Hurst v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:14 am
Humphrey, a capital case involving allegations of racial discrimination in jury selection. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Humphrey, 14-8349 (second post-record relist), asks whether the “Georgia courts err[ed] in failing to recognize race discrimination under Batson in the extraordinary circumstances of this death penalty case. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Humphrey, 14-8349, had six boxes of record arrive on the same day and likewise was relisted a second time. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:40 pm
The petition of the day is: Baltimore City Police Department v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Humphrey; and (3) whether the Heck v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 7:20 pm
The petition of the day is: Wilson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
We have come to understand that the simple division of authority between a legislative, executive and judicial branch is not sufficient to provide guidance for its use in the day to day activities of government. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:14 pm
The petition of the day is: Bishop v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:26 pm
The petition of the day is: Deemer v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Bond v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
”(Ackerman & Fishkin, Deliberation Day, p. 6, quoting from Delli Carpini & Keeter’s comprehensive survey.) [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:23 am
Dept. of Admin., 44 F.3d 538, 544 (7th Cir.1995) (adopting a presumption against working from home except in “extraordinary circumstances”) with Humphrey v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:42 am
If all works well by the end of the day, at least the heads of an agreement will be drafted and signed. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am
The Civil Rights Revolution transformed the Constitution, but not through judicial activism or Article V amendments. [read post]
