Search for: "Ha v. Board of Parole" Results 121 - 140 of 659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2018, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
 Likewise, in the high-profile judicial review of the decision to release the notorious rapist John Worboys, R (DSD and NBV) v Parole Board for England and Wales [2018] EWHC 694 (Admin); [2018] WLR(D) 195, the Divisional Court provided a five page summary via the Judiciary website. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:32 am by INFORRM
On 28 March 2018, in the high profile “Black Cab Rapist” case, the Divisional Court held that Rule 25 of the Parole Board Rules 2016 which prohibits the making public of information about proceedings before the Board was ultra vires (R (DSD and NBV) v Parole Board [2018] EWHC 694 (Admin)). [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am by Barry Sookman
The CRTC has the relevant powers of a court of superior jurisdiction and already makes decisions that affect the fundamental freedoms of Canadians. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette has highlighted comments made by Sir Brian Leveson following the recent rejection of a legal challenge blocking the publication of the decision made by a parole board to release John Worboys. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:45 am by alysondrake
While in the House, she has continued her civil rights and female rights work, including publishing articles about feminist rights. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Marshall Project, Ashley Nellis weighs in on the predicament of Henry Montgomery, whose case led to a Supreme Court decision that expanded the reach of a prior ruling banning mandatory sentences of life without parole for juveniles and who was recently denied parole by the Louisiana Parole Board, noting that “members of the board cited Montgomery’s short list of official classes completed during his time in prison,” but… [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At Injustice Today, Aviva Shen weighs in on the Louisiana parole board’s decision to deny parole to 71-year-old Henry Montgomery, in whose case “SCOTUS held that its previous ruling (Miller v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 12:11 pm by Law Office of Dayna L. Jones
But, on Tuesday February 2018, the Texas Parole Board issued its recommendation that inmate Thomas Bartlett Whitaker not be executed. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 12:11 pm by Law Office of Dayna L. Jones
But, on Tuesday February 2018, the Texas Parole Board issued its recommendation that inmate Thomas Bartlett Whitaker not be executed. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript offers a graphic explainer for Currier v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Following the release of rapist Jon Worboys the Sun has obtained leave to join a legal challenge to the decision of the Parole Board. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:16 am by Marcia Shein
A16A1650 (March 10, 2017) The Board of Pardons and Paroles’ decision to grant a pardon is not reviewable by the courts, though the courts may interpret the scope of the pardon based on the Board’s pardoning language. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette reports on a threatened legal challenge by the Sun and the Mail to obtain the Parole Board Report which resulted in decision to release of John Warboys. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am by DARRYL HUTCHEON, MATRIX
In Brown v Parole Board for Scotland & Ors [2017] UKSC 69 the Supreme Court has once again considered claims by IPP prisoners alleging violation of ECHR, art 5 owing to a lack of opportunity to demonstrate sufficient progress to justify their release. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am by Lorelie S. Masters
  For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
  For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 5:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(See an earlier podcast segment on the topic.)Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Front-end and back-end solutions.Death and TexasUS Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ayestas v. [read post]