Search for: "Hill v. District Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2020, 2:00 am
Andrews v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
District Court judge, Tragarz v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:33 am
Considering “mitigating factors” in setting a disciplinary penalty Matter of Senior v Board of Education of Byram Hills Cent. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 4:25 am
In A.M. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:28 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York granted McGraw Hill and Moody's (together, the "Ratings Agencies") motions to dismiss in both Tsereteli v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
School Dist. v Carlson, 2010 NY Slip Op 03120, Decided on April 13, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Byram Hills Central School District served disciplinary charges upon Gregory E. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 1:46 am
Schriro.In Hill v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 1:20 pm
In Hill v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 1:20 pm
In Hill v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:23 pm
In Potrero Hills Landfill, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:28 pm
Chickering (1976) 18 Cal.3d 190, the Court essentially rejected the two-step approach enunciated in Banker’s Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
The Regents of the University of California/Hills Conservation Network v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Jan. 22, 2019 Grine, J.), the court entered summary judgment in favor of a Defendant and owner under the Hills and Ridges Doctrine. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:29 am
District Court Judge Donovan Frank (D. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:19 pm
Sammartino of the Southern District of California certified a multi-claim wage and hour class in Dilts v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:06 am
See Hill v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 7:12 pm
In his ruling from the bench, the district court judge had said that plaintiffs "were making a mountain out of a mole hill. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 5:45 am
Facts: This case (Hill v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:30 pm
” However, said the court, “no appeal lies from an order denying leave to reargue," citing Hill v Milan, 89 AD3d 1458.* See Matter of Hamilton v Alley, 137 AD3d 1564The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_06564.htm [read post]
