Search for: "Hill v. District of Columbia"
Results 121 - 140
of 262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2012, 12:31 pm
In dissenting from a denial of a Memorylink v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 4:30 am
The case is Kennedy v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Clover Gifts, Inc (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) District Court N D California: Though geographically descriptive, claim mark was suggestive not groundless: Sand Hill Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
The Plaintiff Is Injured Falling Down a Hill after Leaning on an Unsafe Fence Post The plaintiff in Wheeling Park Commission v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:49 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit does not “directly deal with LGBT issues,” “his approach to judging leads some scholars and activists to believe he is unlikely to echo Kennedy’s votes. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
A three-judge panel for the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously with the Biden administration and the Ways and Means Committee, ruling against Trump’s arguments against the committee’s authority, his privacy concerns, and his claim that complying with the request would be unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in Paracha v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 29, 2008 US v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Sterling Drug, Inc., 416 F.2d 417, 426 (2d Cir. 1969).District of Columbia: McNeil Pharmaceutical v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
The rule is currently subject to a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the court has severed issues relating to the methodology supporting the revisions of section 112 of the CAA for expedited review (No. 12-1272). [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
The rule is currently subject to a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the court has severed issues relating to the methodology supporting the revisions of section 112 of the CAA for expedited review (No. 12-1272). [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Berle Professor of Law Columbia Law School James D. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:50 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada weighed in on this issue this past summer in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal) v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am
Link: Read The Opinion Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:57 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking to compel removal of the administrative action to that forum. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
Columbia St. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:55 am
If Virginia followed the District of Columbia's recent ruling in blank">Thomas v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed President Donald J. [read post]
