Search for: "Hughes v. Public Defenders Office"
Results 121 - 140
of 207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
In an age when members of the public can no longer bestir themselves to leave their vaguely couch-shaped objects to purchase needful items in person, South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
First, a suit to enforce the statutory right to exclude is not exempt from the antitrust laws if the infringement defendant shows that the patent was obtained through fraud on the Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
-- SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
Rare is the employment law case that can capture the continuing attention of both the legal profession and the public. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 11:07 am
It is about a young federal public defender handling a case, United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
In the Courts On 7 December 2011 Mr Justice Eady gave judgment in the case of McKeown v Attheraces Ltd [2011] EWHC 3232 (QB), giving the defendant permission to amend, ordering trial by judge alone and refusing an application for trial of a preliminary issue. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
In Katz v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
(As he himself notes, he in effect put aside the work he had been doing in in order to delve into the world of the internet, including copyright and the implications of the new social media, where he became one of the ranking academics and public intellectuals. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
Department of Energy Office of the Inspector General sent 14; and the U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm
[People v. firms? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
The reporting restriction followed a successful application by the Ministry of Defence to anonymise the 29 year old defendant’s name. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm
The press have also mentioned a potential claim by Hugh Grant. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Secondly, there was Eady J’s judgment in the case of CTB v News Group Newspapers (No.4) [2011] EWHC 3099 (QB) was made public. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
MLDI legal officer, Nani Jansen, described the case in an Inforrm post here. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
Hughes v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
He defended a statement accusing Hugh Grant of “mendacious smears” against his newspapers, saying the actor had attempted to discredit Associated Newspapers by telling the inquiry he believed his phone had been hacked by Mail journalists. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
The second case, IPCC v Warner ([2012] EWHC 271 (QB)) concerned an injunction prohibiting the defendants from disclosing documents and information which had been sent by the IPCC to the first defendant by mistake. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
