Search for: "I.C."
Results 121 - 140
of 277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2013, 4:17 am
No. 280, § 7, Idaho limited its jurisdiction to the offenses itemized in I.C. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:05 am
I.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:18 pm
§ 1125(c) Count V: Trademark Dilution under I.C. 24-2-1-13.5 Count VII [sic]: Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive Relief Count VIII: Corrective Advertising Damages Plaintiff asks the court for injunctive relief, costs and attorneys’ fees. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 1:33 am
I.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:18 pm
§ 1125(c) Count V: Trademark Dilution under I.C. 24-2-1-13.5 Count VII [sic]: Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive Relief Count VIII: Corrective Advertising Damages Plaintiff asks the court for injunctive relief, costs and attorneys’ fees. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 10:08 pm
Pursuant to I.C. 33-33-48-7.5, the Judges of the Madison Superior Court shall appoint a full-time, state-paid Magistrate and assign to said Magistrate such duties as they may designate from time to time.For all of Madison County's local rules, follow this link. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 12:16 am
Prior to the passage of HEA 1001, the statute stated counties were responsible for paying for appointed counsel in termination proceedings; the revised statute now says DCS shall pay the cost of any child services provided by or through the department for any child or the child's parent, guardian, or custodian.Chief Judge John Baker and Melissa May concluded court appointed counsel doesn't constitute "services" within the meaning of the statute, relying on I.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:33 pm
” The Idaho Supreme Court made clear that the state’s Whistleblower Act, I.C. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 11:49 pm
I.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
According to the established case law of the Boards of appeal the technical teaching of examples can be combined with the teaching offered elsewhere in the same document (such as in the description of a patent document) provided that the example under consideration is in line with the general technical teaching that is disclosed in the document (Case Law, 6th edition, I.C.2.2). [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:21 am
The Indiana Trademark Act (I.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 7:24 am
They eat just about anything living, including other snapping turtles.Feeding a live puppy to a snapping turtle, who would presumably cut the pup into bite-sized pieces and then eat the pieces, would violate I.C. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 11:28 am
However, that gallows humor crosses the line when it involves molesting or desecrating a corpse, and may cross the line when unauthorized photographs are taken and/or disseminated by non-family members.Idaho law prohibits the abuse of a corpse in I.C. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:30 am
A trademark is personal property, so Indiana's analogous state statute is I.C. 34-11-2-4(a), which provides for a two-year statute of limitations: "Sec. 4. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 10:56 am
B.J. 607As stated in In re Nomiya, n79 discussed infra Part I.C, admitted prior art can be used for any purpose regardless of whether a statutory basis exists under § 102. n80 The Federal Circuit has embraced the broader interpretation of this premise: admitted prior art can be used for both anticipation and obviousness determinations, regardless of statutory basis under § 102. n81***But separately note from an IPBiz post in January 2013:Note from stratfordpub Obviousness Standard… [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
See I.C. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:40 pm
Cox, 260 Ind. 448, 452, 296 N.E.2d 422, 425 (1973) (discussing the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, currently codified at I.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:07 am
See I.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:27 pm
The trial court has carefully considered the assets and debt and has divided the marital estate pursuant to the provisions of I.C. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
In other words, there is no indication in document D1 from which it can be derived that, when the group R contains 8 carbon atoms, there necessarily have to be 4 ethoxylate units in the alcohol of formula R-(O-CH2-CH2)k-OH (see Case Law of the Boards of appeal, 6th edition, I.C..4.1.1.c).[5.3] As document D1 was the only document used to challenge the novelty of claim 1, the Board comes to the conclusion that the claimed subject-matter of claim 1 of the impugned patent is novel (A 54).The… [read post]
