Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 2 OF RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW" Results 121 - 140 of 283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  Hacked Off commented that the fact that this admission was made more than 6 years after the allegations were made was a clear indication that Leveson Part 2 should take place. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:51 am
The panel opinion, in a Hebrew and Yiddish laden explication, described the ritual practices the Defendants believed Jewish law required or entitled them to  engaged in. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:48 am by Riana Pfefferkorn
  Defendants have asserted that the Sixth Amendment and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 entitle them to extensive information about the Playpen NIT. [read post]
2 May 2017, 10:25 am by Dean Falvy
According to the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act, early elections could only be triggered by (1) a parliamentary vote of no-confidence in the government, or (2) a two-thirds vote of Parliament. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
But at George Mason (now the Antonin Scalia Law School) the admissions advisor, Prof. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
This principle could easily apply to, for instance, speech about educational policies, proper rules governing sexual relationships, and “social justice. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm by Josh Blackman
However, after President Trump fired her, the government lawyers got to work, and filed a response on February 2. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  In her analysis of post-Civil War jurisprudence, Atkinson distinguishes between procedural and substantive due process, because the privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment opened the door for corporations to assert substantive constitutional rights.2. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm by Helen Klein Murillo
Without quoting the ICRC documents, the ICRC summarily criticizes the government, the United States Government, for breaking the law with respect to family communications. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
But that is in turn only about 2% of the $24 per employee that Access Copyright asked for.This arguably much too high rate may be due at least in part to CMEC’s reliance on the same problematic “Volume Study” it used in the last 2005-2009 hearing that was already seriously flawed at the time by their own admission because, as I suggested in 2009. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
  Full disclosure:  Reed Smith is involved in Caplinger, so consider this entry a non-RS post.In re Celexa & Lexapro Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation, 779 F.3d 34 (1st Cir. 2015). [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Shahid Buttar
Judge Leon examined the allegations of whistleblowers, and the government’s admissions. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
” The denial continues the Court’s general pattern of passing on Second Amendment challenges to gun control laws since the Court decided McDonald v. [read post]
Employers are encouraged to audit their salary structure and recordkeeping practices and policies to ensure compliance with the law before it takes effect. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
In a dissent from denial of cert. that wound up just one vote short, Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, urged that “nothing in our precedents clearly establishes the[] admissibility [of such recantations] as a matter of federal constitutional law. [read post]