Search for: "IN RE E W" Results 121 - 140 of 3,920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2009, 6:31 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
[W]e conclude that the plain meaning of “actual damages” points to a different result. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 3:42 am
"] In re Lakshmi Distributors, Serial No. 90174273 (September 27, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:53 am
The TTAB recently decided the appeals from three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:55 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In re Queens University (Fed. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:40 pm by Lauren-Kelly Devine
Director of the CDC Office on Smoking and Health Tim McAfee agrees, stating “[w]e must keep our youth from experimenting or using any tobacco product. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 7:56 am
On the other hand:"[W]e do not have specific information about treatments considered “unproven,” experimental or investigational, such as plasma transfusions from recovered patients or the medication Zmapp. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
”); In re Lovin, 652 F.3d1349, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:44 pm by Kelly
We’re Rich, We’re Rich! [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:46 am by Eva Rosenberg
Did your preparer at least re-compute your tax liability or refund so you know what to expect once both W-2s are taken into account? [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:00 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
If you expect to claim the child tax credit (line E) – remember that phaseouts apply based on your income. [read post]