Search for: "IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY"
Results 121 - 140
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2012, 3:14 pm
The Court held that, under In re Seagate Tech, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:23 am
In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1368 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
"The objective baselessness standard for enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees against a non-prevailing plaintiff under Brooks Furniture is identical to the objective recklessness standard for enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees against an accused infringer for § 284 willful infringement actions under In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:24 pm
Hyundai, the plaintiff won on infringement of one patent, but not the other, and $34 million in damages, but post-In Re Seagate the willfullness finding was essentially dropped, and no injunction was entered (or attorneys fees awarded). [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 11:05 am
In both cases, the Federal Circuit held that enhanced damages were not available under that court’s 2007 decision in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, which permits enhanced damages only upon clear and convincing evidence of objectively reckless willfulness. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]Highlights this week included: European Commission launches consultation on ‘Content Online in the Single Market': (IPKat), (Out-Law), (IPR Helpdesk), UK government launches consultation on copyright exceptions: (IPKat), (Michael Geist), (IMPACT), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Out-Law), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), Cordis Corporation - US Court of Appeals… [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
” Yet 101 is controversial – the rate of ex parte decisions addressing 101 has also shot up, from less than 10% to over 80% in 2018 in medical diagnostic and software technology areas, and to 26% overall. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Nahum (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court Nevada: Online forum operator gets easy 47 USC 230 Win: Two Plus Two v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
NuVasive, Inc., No. 15-85 (Commil re-hash – mens rea requirement for inducement) 3. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
NuVasive, Inc., No. 15-85 (Commil re-hash – mens rea requirement for inducement) 3. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
Bard Inc.'s patent on a type of prosthetic blood vessel graft, company to pay damages of $185 million: (IPLaw360), Depomed secures summary judgment against Ivax in its patent dispute regarding its AcuForm controlled-release drug delivery technology: (IPLaw360),Dell and Motion Computing hit with patent infringement suit by Typhoon Touch: (IPBiz), EBay vows fight over final judgment in patent suit against MercExchange: (IPLaw360), … [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
Seagate Technology et al. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
” In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371(Fed. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 9:04 am
As for the future, the recent trend of legislating from the bench - cases such as KSR, eBay, In re Seagate etc. have drastically limited the value of this business model. [read post]
