Search for: "In Interest of JS" Results 121 - 140 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2010, 11:19 am by axd10
Smith Stacks JS 395 .T76 2008 Sarah Bracking, ed. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm by Giles Peaker
The best interests of children are a primary consideration: see, for example, R (JS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) per Elias LJ at paras 42 to 46. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 4:53 pm by Anup Surendranath
While the majority held that Paragraph 7 was severable and thereby saving the rest of the X Schedule, the minority (Justices JS Verma and LM Sharma) was of the view that the whole of X Schedule was invalid because Paragraph 7 could not be severed. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
By the way, thanks again to JS, who continues to tirelessly mine the unpublished Court of Appeal opinions and send me the gems like this one. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 7:40 am by Janet Stewart Scalley
For further guidance on these and other related matters, please contact Janet Stewart Scalley (js@kjk.com; 216.736.7261) or another member of KJK Family Law by calling 216.696.8700. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by John N. Davis
Maybe there's nothing very interesting there anymore. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:46 am by tekEditor
Which is why I am loathe to write an article like this but after being mis-represented on twitter for the ump-tenth time, I decided it would be in my best interest to attempt to articulate my perspective first hand. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 12:01 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
It is settled law that every statute is prima facie prospective unless it is expressly or by necessary implication made to have a retrospective effect [See, for example, JS Yadav v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Against JS Mill, we have not assumed that truth will always out; we have tended to try to tip the balance in its favour by careful design of media institutions. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 7:54 am by Janet Stewart Scalley
For further guidance on these and other related matters, please contact Janet Stewart Scalley (js@kjk.com; 216.736.7261) or another member of KJK Family Law by calling 216-696-8700. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by Jay Shepherd
Follow Jay on Twitter at @jayshep, or email him at js@shepherdlawgroup.com. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 1:37 pm by Janet Stewart Scalley
If you need assistance on these or other domestic relations matter, please contact Janet Stewart Scalley at JS@kjk.com or by phone at (216) 696-8700. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
If you’re interested in this, here’s a nice post on how a personal injury law firm uses it. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:38 am by frank_bennett
Formatting citations There are a few commonly-encountered wrinkles in legal data and citation styles that CSL and the citeproc-js formatter have been carefully designed to address. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
A short time later an article appeared in the online version of a Hungarian daily (Magyar Nemzet Online), containing the editor-in-chief’s letter as well as a statement of Magyar Elektronikus Újságírók Szövetsége (Hungarian Union of Electronic Journalists), inviting the board to end censorship in the television company. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:12 am by Jay Shepherd
Follow Jay on Twitter at @jayshep, or email him at js@shepherdlawgroup.com. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 2:12 pm by Janet Stewart Scalley
If you need assistance on these or other domestic relations matter, please contact Janet Stewart Scalley at js@kjk.com or by phone at (216) 696-8700. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 8:35 am by Jay Shepherd
Follow Jay on Twitter at @jayshep, or email him at js@shepherdlawgroup.com. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:35 am by Jay Shepherd
Follow Jay on Twitter at @jayshep, or email him at js@shepherdlawgroup.com. [read post]