Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
An interesting discussion was [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:39 pm
Court of Appeal The Court of Appeal (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Sir Geoffrey Vos C and Davis LJ) ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599) unanimously allowed Mr Lloyd’s appeal on all three grounds, granting him permission to serve out. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 12:36 pm
In 2000, in an article in the UNB Law Journal (Vol. 49, 169) about section 33, entitled “Section 33 of the Charter: What’s the Problem, Anyway? [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 1:01 pm
Patten LJ continued, at paragraph 33: “But as with any statutory provision it is necessary to have regard to the totality of the relevant provisions and to construe them by reference to the regime which they were intended to facilitate. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 4:18 pm
(Paras 39-41 of King LJ’s judgment and below). [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
The ABC managing director, David Anderson, has mounted a strong defence of Louise Milligan’s reporting on Christian Porter, saying her journalism was in the public interest and of the “highest quality”. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:37 pm
Issue: the standard of proof in s.9 applications In Wright v Ver [2020] 1 WLR 3913, Dingemans LJ held (obiter) that the standard of proof in s.9 applications is the ‘balance of probabilities’. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
On 16 March 2021 the Court of Appeal (Vos MR, Sharp P, Warby LJ) heard an appeal in the case of Millett v Corbyn. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Advocacy A lawyer’s role is to pursue her client’s interests within the bounds of legality. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am
Normal service looks to have been resumed following the Court of Appeal judgment in IPCom v Vodafone [2021] EWCA Civ 205, in which Arnold LJ reversed a first instance finding by Recorder Douglas Campbell QC that Vodafone was entitled to a defence of Crown use in respect of certain acts which infringed an IPCom patent, as well as providing some interesting commentary on the application of the de minimis infringement defence. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am
At first instance, the Administrative Court (Gross LJ and Ouseley J) rejected KBR, Inc’s challenge. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:36 am
Males LJ was correct to hold that the court did not have jurisdiction to dispense with service. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 8:14 am
” “Coulson LJ and Males LJ concluded that the clause dealing with conflicts in SCL’s engagement letter created an ongoing obligation for SCL to avoid conflicts of interest. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 3:57 am
In 2017, Noble settled the ICA claim for US$ 500,000 (inclusive of costs and interest over 5 years). [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
In this regard, the analysis and conclusions of Sales LJ in the Court of Appeal is generally to be preferred to that of the majority. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:21 am
In a judgment given by Laws LJ on 21 April 2016 ([2016] EWCA Civ 597), the Court of Appeal rejected all three. [read post]
Case Preview: Protect Rural England (Kent) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
27 Jan 2021, 2:30 am
The Court of Appeal judgment[1] Issue one: costs where permission is refused Coulson LJ, with whom Hamblen LJ and David Richards LJ agreed, summarised the Court’s view on issue one at [37] by reference to three principles. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 10:31 am
The case raises a number of important and interesting questions, of which the most significant (for a copyright lawyer) is what sort of contribution to a collaborative work is going to make the second collaborator a joint author. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 10:31 am
The case raises a number of important and interesting questions, of which the most significant (for a copyright lawyer) is what sort of contribution to a collaborative work is going to make the second collaborator a joint author. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 1:45 am
In the proceedings the FCA has represented the interests of policyholders. [read post]
