Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 121 - 140
of 9,747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2013, 10:31 pm
In re Ronald Bennett and Jacob Fakouri, Serial No. 85485633 (May 13, 2013) [not precedential]. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 3:30 am
In re SolarWindow Technologies, Inc., Serial No. 87819480 (March 5, 2021) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jyll Taylor).Under the doctrine of res judicata, or claim preclusion, "a judgment on the merits in a prior suit bars a second suit involving the same parties or third privies based on the same cause of action. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 6:05 am
“They’re so completely different. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:50 am
Since the issue was use in the U.S., the defendant won.While the court technically sidestepped the issue of whether the design was protectable under the Lanham Act (all but saying that it wasn't), there were three separate opinions totaling 36 pages (the majority by Judge Easterbrook, with concurrences by Judges Posner and Wood) concerning how foreign law should be proved under Fed. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
The outcome of an action in which Gate Arm is the patentee and Access Masters is the entity who re-designed an accused product. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:25 am
I once heard a TTAB judge state that the outcome of most Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases can be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods or services, without more. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 3:30 am
In re Boot Royalty Company, L.P., Serial No. 88727081 (September 30, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Elizabeth A. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:09 am
In re CLAAS KGaA mbH, Serial No. 87112755 Serial No. 87112787 (February 20, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin).The Board observed that "[t] he critical inquiry in determining whether a designation functions as a mark is how the designation would be perceived by the relevant public. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:42 am
" In re W.F. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:20 am
In re Paws4Peace, LLC Serial No. 85215720 (May 29, 2013) [not precedential].The marks: The Board noted that both designs comprise fanciful paw prints with the metacarpal pad replaced by a peace symbol. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:29 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Arizona Elk Society, Serial No. 87782453 (September 30, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Elizabeth A. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:01 am
In re Krete LLC, Serial No. 90369855 (June 24, 2002) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 3:41 am
And they’re not. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:54 am
[E]ven if purchasers note the difference in the design elements in the marks, they are not likely to view the different designs as indicating separate sources for the goods. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:15 am
[Answers in first comment].In re Thomas Barnette, Serial No. 87425197 (January 29, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:22 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Brite and Clean, Inc., Serial No. 87384194 (October 7, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 3:12 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Ben Zour, Serial No. 87210472 (December 19, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Francie R. [read post]
18 May 2016, 3:14 am
See In re Dial-A-Mattress Operating Corp., 57 USPQ2d 1807, 1812-13 (Fed. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 7:15 am
You know these judges, they're all about balancing, and a decision could go in either direction, depending on how the weights feel in the hand holding the scales of justice.But Judge Robart took action and Judge Gorton refrained from taking action. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 11:42 am
Once I obtain a transcript and re-read it, I may find that Judge Rawlinson has a certain inclination, but just based on watching the livestream of the hearing, I think she hasn't formed a definitive opinion yet.Judge Murphy III (from the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation) appeared most deferential to the district court, and relatively speaking, more likely to support affirmance than the other members of the panel. [read post]
