Search for: "In Re: Mathes v." Results 121 - 140 of 365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am by David Post
At least some of the justices, he suggests, have “a reluctance — even an allergy — to taking math and statistics seriously,” as evidenced most recently by their questions and comments at the Oct. 3 oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Gill v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The method correcting the math, applying something called a stochastic threshold to the data, resulted in many instances where previous matches from DNA, all of the sudden, were called into question. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 4:44 am by SHG
From the bench, Chief Justice John Roberts asked in Fisher v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:26 am
May 2, 2017 - 11 AM: In re Volcano Produce, Inc., Serial No. 86321169 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of GOLDENBERRY for "fresh fruits"].May 2, 2017 -2 PM: In re Red Lobster Hospitality, LLC, Serial Nos. 85179591 and 85179618 [refusal to register the mark shown below, in color and in black-and-white, for "restaurant services and restaurant carry-out services," without a disclaimer of LOBSTER].May 4, 2017 -2 PM: Advanced California Innovative… [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
See for example this report on the collaborative drafting of a book on “Homotopy type theory” (which is some kind of bleeding edge math theory, if you’re curious). [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 4:24 am by Linda Hazelton
The students and coaches then came together to design, build, test, re-design, re-build, test again, re-design... well, you get the idea. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am by SHG
I’m obviously very bad at math because, 15 years later, I’m still here. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Can., 2008-07-31), 2008 CSC 47, SOQUIJ AZ-50505229, J.E. 2008-1506, [2008] 2 R.C.S. 675, a écarté l’approche purement mathématique que véhicule la version française de la disposition, dont le sens commun suggérait simplement de déterminer le nombre de déclarations de culpabilité requis par l’utilisation de l’expression «plusieurs déclarations de culpabilité». [read post]