Search for: "In Re Adoption of Cox"
Results 121 - 140
of 177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2007, 4:46 am
" Other firms adopting similar policies include Cox Communications, Del Monte, Visa, and Pitney Bowes. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:28 am
United States, consolidated with Cox v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Even if we're judgment-proof, we aren't jail-proof (unless we're safely anonymous or outside the jurisdiction). [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
The next day, the commodore realized his mistake, re-raised the Mexican flag and retreated. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 1:06 pm
The Fourth Circuit will be considering the issue of what constitutes a repeat infringer in a dispute between BMG and Cox and will likely issue a decision sometime in 2017. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Ct. 2567 (2011), so we’re not going over that again. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 9:25 am
” Chris Cox He says the Internet “has come to be defined by user-created content,” and Section 230 is a big part of that. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
Borrowing again from Delaware law, the court explained that “Delaware courts interpreting” a similar statute “have concluded that it provides that only disinterested shareholders votes may be considered” in ratification of a board decision (citing In re Cox Communications, Inc. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 10:01 pm
Greg Lambert 7:57 So there’s a quote that you use from the Cox review of creativity in business, and it’s all the way back in 2005. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 10:01 pm
Greg Lambert 7:57 So there’s a quote that you use from the Cox review of creativity in business, and it’s all the way back in 2005. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
This exception applies “where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted” Court applied same bifurcated standard of review as has been developed for the unusual circumstances exception – whether the project is located in a particularly sensitive environment is a substantial evidence question; but the question of impact based on such a location is a fair argument question… [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
A letter from shareholders to the Honorable Christopher Cox, requesting a return to the pre-1990 interpretation of the Rule, stressed an important distinction: ". . . between using a shareholder resolution as a back-door device to contest a specific election and using a shareholder resolution in order to change the rules for election so as to further the long-term interests of shareholders. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm
This was an appeal from the United States District Court for theMiddle District of Florida in No. 3:11-cv-00819-TJC-JRK,Judge Timothy J. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Our Working Group’s members may write to the Commission separately on whether, as a matter of policy, the proposal should be adopted or modified; those matters are beyond the scope of these comments. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Thus, the bills unintentionally adopted accurate titles, and they self-admitted their unconstitutionality. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
And my concern is making sure we don’t adopt a precedent because we don’t like Trump’s policies which could then be used against any political target, like a loaded weapon lying around. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
April 2004 CanadaAbstractAlthough some studies suggest positive effects of treatment for sexual offenders, most studies have been hampered by the unknown influence of selective attrition (e.g., volunteers and drop-outs). [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
R. of Evid. 801(d)(2)(A) and (B) exempt from the hearsay rule statements made or adopted by the party-opponent. 2. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
R. of Evid. 801(d)(2)(A) and (B) exempt from the hearsay rule statements made or adopted by the party-opponent. 2. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:32 am
” The case we’re concerned with is Flagg v. [read post]
