Search for: "In Re Adoption of a Female Child"
Results 121 - 140
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 7:49 pm
The appellate court rejected this line of reasoning: “[W]e disagree with the state’s argument, which the circuit court apparently adopted, that the defendant’s possession of the DVDs violated his probation because the DVDs depicted females and the underlying victim was female. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:01 pm
In re Madrone: An Unmarried, Lesbian Couple and a Child Now let’s consider another lesbian couple: Karah and Lorrena Madrone. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
The Charter In the years immediately following the adoption of the Charter, some scholars suggested that it should be interpreted so as to provide protection for socio-economic rights, including the right to health care. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
Wisconsin, 14-555, then an eighteen-year-old female with “some mental limitations” (that describes most of us), was arrested and charged with statutory assault of a child after the mother of her fourteen-year-old paramour/victim discovered the two had had sex. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 8:32 am
Here’s what the Oklahoma Supreme Court held about this in In re Adoption of K.P.M.A. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:29 am
Put simply, it’s in the interest of all parties to make sure pregnant employees don’t lose their jobs just because they’re pregnant. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Female: What about the sex of the child? [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
New Jersey law has adopted the single publication rule and applies it to publications on the Internet. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 2:29 pm
Because such proceedings were non-criminal in nature and brought on behalf of the child by the state as "parens patriae", the traditional procedural safeguards applicable to criminal prosecutions were deemed inapplicable as in In re Urbasek and In re C.S. [read post]
28 May 2014, 9:01 pm
That is precisely the principle Laycock advocated and the Court adopted. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:01 pm
Pssssst - run out and find me a four-year-old child. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 2:01 pm
Pssssst – run out and find me a four-year-old child. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:18 am
Aside: This is still not a post about what to wear, whether male or female, or whether Judge Kopf is a sexist pig deserving of vitriol. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
First, the non-paternity rule, adopted as part of a comprehensive parentage act in 1994 and based on a model act adopted by many other states, imposed clear requirements. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 8:58 am
In re Estate of Mosery, 349 N.J. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
Or how about this: If I gave my child up for adoption, and some other guy at Time Warner adopted her, he would get 10 weeks off, paid, to take care of her. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
The most striking application of this approach was the practice, almost universally adopted, of denying an adulterous wife not merely custody of, but even access to her children. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The California bill was passed in reaction to a 2011 case, In re M.C., in which two women and a man each seemed to meet the criteria to be a legal parent of the same child. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Chenery Corp., by upholding agency action based on, and by purporting to “defer” to, an interpretation of the Clean Air Act that the EPA itself not only never adopted – but in fact expressly rejected. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm
In re Bicknel, the court granted application of two women to assume same new last name] and In re Miller, the court granted woman right to assume surname of her life companion. [read post]
