Search for: "In Re Application of Smith"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Smith v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am
And that opinion was written by–so we're told–one of the biggest hacks in the judiciary: Judge Jim Ho. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Lindsey Graham, Case 22-12696 (11th Cir. 2022), denial of application for stay and an injunction pending appeal by Supreme Court (Nov. 1, 2022). [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 7:23 pm
Enrollment To enroll as an REH, eligible facilities that satisfy the eligibility criteria outlined above must submit a change of information application, rather than an initial enrollment application, except in the case of facilities that were enrolled as CAHs as of December 27, 2020 and subsequently closed, in which case the facility must re-enroll in Medicare. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:09 am
’ He also said: ‘If you’re in the federal government, you’re in the state government, you’re an African-American politician working for the government, you are at risk because of the U.S. attorney’s office’ in Maryland. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm
Per Carr J in Parsa v DS Smith Plc [2019] Costs LR 331 at [35] in respect of an application in respect of fixed following late acceptance of a Part 36 offer: “The substantive litigation had ended; the claim had settled in relation to all bar costs and had been stayed by the automatic operation of CPR 36.14 . [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
Caremark started out as a logical consequence of Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:49 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am
The correct citations are: Re Springwood Cemetery Allerton [2022] ECC Liv 1 Re Widnes Cemetery [2022] ECC Liv 2 Re Christ Church Padgate [2022] ECC Liv 3 These have been updated in our posts on the monthly and annual round-up of decisions. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
Some of them are legal and either help applicants or give nonbinding advice. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 12:34 am
The network surveillance cases then bookend Smith v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Smith, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 915, at pp. 937-38), or “a sufficient substitute basis for testing the evidence” (Khelawon, at para. 105). [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm
Various Claimants v MGN [2022] EWHC 1222 (Ch) A case concerning the ongoing phone hacking litigation against Mirror Group Newspapers (“MGN”) in which MGN issued and served applications for summary judgment in 23 individual claims. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 3:56 am
In re Smith & Vandiver, Corp., Serial No. 88477576 (December 20, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Martha B. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Indeed, one quite justified criticism of Our Undemocratic Constitution is that it was stronger on raw assertion than on the development and then application of a robust notion of democracy. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
On 13 December 2022, Saini J heard argument in the case of Smith v Talk Talk Telecom (QB-2020-003019). [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:54 pm
Reed Smith will continue to monitor related developments. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
In re Smith & Vandiver, Corp., Serial No. 88477572 (December 13, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:22 am
Avoid generic subject lines like “May 2023 Smith Law Firm Newsletter,” as these can be easily overlooked. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:19 pm
Its application is limited to five years and the remedy for misuse is a political one — if voters do not approve its use, they can vote against the government at the next election — governments with a majority prepared to weather criticism, even from other members of the legislature, are free to invoke it and to reinvoke it after five years should they retain power. [read post]
