Search for: "In Re Austin S. Et Al."
Results 121 - 131
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
See In re Chambers, No. 01-01-01216-CV, 2002 WL 24567 (Tex. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Burst at *14. failed to conduct an appropriate analysis of the entire dataset, along the lines of Sir Austin Bradford Hill’s nine factors. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
-Austin Mar. 24, 2011, no pet.) [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
” Austin Bradford Hill, “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
All the parties’ epidemiology witnesses invoked Sir Austin Bradford Hill’s viewpoints or factors for judging whether associations were causal.[15] Although they embraced Hill’s viewpoints on causation, the plaintiffs’ epidemiologic expert witnesses had a much more difficult time faithfully applying them to the evidence at hand. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Oliver et al (2008) published a comprehensive review of developments and future outlooks for pre-harvest food safety this month. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
See Jan Rigby, et al., “Can physical trauma cause breast cancer? [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
But it was the ruling’s impact on utility regulation, not the cost, that prompted the appeals court to reverse the decision. [read post]
